Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. MILENSI<I: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br /> MR. MILLER: <br /> MR. STAPLETON: <br />I MR. WHITTEN: <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br />- MR. WHITTEN: <br /> <br />"We insisted on it and so did the State of <br />California, What was actually done, I do not <br />know. But I know they were trying to figure out <br />some method of handling it so as to get what was <br />desired the last time I heard," <br /> <br />"It's sort of a new precedent, isn't it?" <br /> <br />"That's right, They were extremely doubt- <br />ful as to how it could be handled, but Congress- <br />man Aspinall assured me that it would be fully <br />taken care of in the best way it could possibly <br />be done with the Congress," <br /> <br />"When are the hearings to be?" <br /> <br />"We anticipate that the hearings will be <br />held early in March. They will be limited type <br />hearings, That is, we have built up an exten- <br />sive record on this project over the years and <br />we anticipate that the hearings will be rela- <br />tively short." <br /> <br />"You'd like something in addition at this <br />time, such as acceptance in principle of the <br />legislation and the operating principles as <br />amended? I'll entertain such a motion," <br /> <br />"I so move," <br /> <br />"Mr. Milenski moves. Is there a second to <br />the motion?" <br /> <br />"I'll second the motion," <br /> <br />"Seconded by Mr. Miller. Is there any dis- <br />cussion on the motion?" <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"Mr, Whitten." <br /> <br />"I'm not sure that I follow the thinking <br />behind these operating principles and perhaps <br />Larry can clear that up for me in a minute or <br />two. Why would they insist on operating prin- <br />ciples for tbe construction of a project?" <br />