My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00444
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00444
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:50:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/11/1961
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.o:::::.o:::::ov <br /> <br />the map as the 'Hardin Reservoir site' and <br />sometimes called the Weld County site. I <br />might say that from the previous experience <br />with respect to what is called the Narrows, <br />there is much distaste in our area with re~ <br />spect to the Narrows.' But since that time <br />there have been many studies made, and without <br />enumerating,them, by our board and by our <br />engineers in our area, and we are inclined to <br />the conviction that there will be much less <br />expense cllid niany, many advantages gained, <br />including the possibility of a complete <br />reuse - one additional complete reuie - of <br />water were a main stem storage possible at <br />the Weld County or Hardin site, and also con- <br />sidering the possibility of two large' reser- <br />voirs transferring their point of storage. <br />We so firmly believe this that we think that <br />the studies that would be undertaken as pro- <br />posed here by the Director, would confirm <br />these many findings that we have. But we are <br />inclined to think that we cannot convince <br />anyone by ourselves, so it would be our ~osi- <br />tion that it is almost mandatory for a complete <br />study of this South Platte and that the 'study <br />that is proposed be financed and unaertaken as <br />rapidly as possible. particularly with respect <br />to this Hardin site. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I might.also comment, that we, in view- <br />ing the entire' picture i .' believe that. our posi- <br />tion is in entire harmony with the ups~ream <br />users incl~ding the City and County of Denver. <br />It is not hard to conceive the mutual advan- <br />tages if, with what water we have in this area <br />below the Hardin site, we can obtain a very <br />much more efficient use, and'that that will <br />relieve the pressure of the requirements that <br />must be continued to be delivered downstream. <br />So, I think on behalf of our board, at least <br />sp~aking personally since I am not the presi- <br />dent.of the board, I couldn't forcib1y enough <br />urge ~hat.this Board urge the Legislature to <br />appr~priate the funds to make the studies. <br />particularly with respect to the Hardin site." <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.