My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00390
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:37:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/6/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />215 <br /> <br />MR. BAILEY: <br /> <br />MR. HUNTER: <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFOJill: <br />MR. BAILEY: <br /> <br />MR. PUGHE: <br /> <br />MR. BAIIEY: <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />MR. PUGHE: <br /> <br />specific attention should be dftvoted to the <br />relationship between oil shale and consumption <br />of water; also coal hydrogenation and consump~ion <br />of water and such other water subjects as interested <br />parties might want to bring up. Leaving a day <br />between, we would hold another meeting in Durango <br />on the 26. It was felt that the Glenwood meeting <br />would take cere of interest in Craig, the north <br />centr.al area, and Durango would take care of <br />interests in that part of the state. If there is <br />no objection on the part of the Board we will go, <br />ahead with this arrangement. <br /> <br />Any members of the Board are to feel free to <br />attend one or both of those meetings. <br /> <br />At the meeting in Durango, if you will get in <br />touch with me I w~ll arrange for hotel accomodations. <br /> <br />Thank you, will do that. <br /> <br />Does anyone have any suggestions about these. <br />proposed meetings. If no objections, we will go <br />ahead and have them. <br /> <br />Have they been deEni tely set for that time? <br /> <br />So far as the Committee is concerned, they have. <br /> <br />There are several reasons why they can't be held <br />earlier. During the week of the 16, 17 and 18 <br />we have the congressional delegation, during the <br />previous :week we are getting back into the Labor <br />Day and the inability of the people from the oil <br />companies to attend; so the earliest possible <br />time is the last week in September. <br /> <br />Could we snag some of that congressional committee <br />for the meeting in Glenwood? They are going back <br />west again to review the Upper Colorado R;Lver. <br />That starts out for September 12, I believe. . They <br />might be all through by the 24th. Could you advance <br />a day or two to include them. They might want to be <br />in on it. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.