BOARD00380

• Board Meeting Date: 7/30/1958
• Description: Minutes and Resolution
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Meeting

1075

that he would not approve something which he thought the Board
would not approve.

I

An interpretation of just what the letter stated was
asked for by Mr. Peterson who said it should be written out in
such plain language that there would be no question of what the
intent was ten years hence.

General discussion on the meaning of the letter and
its intent followed.

MR. MOSES:

"I sympathize with Mr. Peterson's
desire that no area be left open for later
interpretation if they can be spelled out
at this time. Two of the questions raised
might be answered by a motion to approve
this letter which includes first, a state-
ment that these functions are to be per-
formed by the committee only after being
passed by the Board, and second, that em-
ployment will be subject to the approval
of the Board when deemed advisable by the
Director."

MR. PETERSON:

"I am wondering if it would be possi-
ble to instigate this by passing a motion
to appoint a committee to prepare a reso-
lution approving this letter."

MR. MOSES:

"I would entertain a motion that I
appoint such a committee to prepare such
a resolution, we will then adjourn for
30 minutes and come back and see if we
have come up with something."

MR. PETERSON:

"I would like to suggest that you,
Mr. Chairman, serve on this committee."

MR. CHRISTY:

"I would like to move that the
Chairman appoint a three man committee
consisting of himself, the Director and
one representative from the Water Con-
gress to draft such a resolution."

I

MR. WHITTEN:

"I second the motion."

Mr. Stapleton asked if the Board passed such a reso-
lution, in connection with the filling of Glen Canyon Dam, how