My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00349
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00349
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:14 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:36:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/9/1980
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Members, Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />July 1, 1980 <br />Page four <br /> <br />reservoirs take preference over repairs to existing storage <br />facilities and if so, how ~hould this preference be expressed <br />(e.g., only so many dollar~ from the construction fund for <br />repairs and the balance re~erved for new reservoirs)? <br /> <br />B. Section 37-60-119(2) Colorado Revised Statutes i973, provides <br />that the Board may enter into contracts for the use of water <br />and power facilities by and with any agency or political <br />subdivision of this state, with individuals, with corporations, <br />or with organizations composed of citizens of this state. <br /> <br />Within the last six months; we have received applications <br />from two individual families. One would involve the instal- <br />lation of a well to provide domestic water for a family <br />residence. The second wou1d involve a small storage reservoir <br />in North Park to provide supplemental water to about 3,200 <br />acres of presently irrigated land and about sac acres of new <br />land. Even though the proposed project would benefit a con- <br />siderable acreage of land, it nevertheless would benefit but <br />one individual family. <br /> <br />In all probability, we will receive additional applications <br />of this nature in the future. The staff would appreciate the <br />Board's guidance and/or policy on how to treat applications <br />from individuals or individual families. <br /> <br />2. Criteria for determining the terms of the Board's participation in <br />State projects. <br /> <br />A. Existing policy. <br /> <br />1. Limitation on state funds in anyone project. <br /> <br />Since available construction funds have been limited in <br />the past, it has been the Board's policy that the con- <br />struction fund be utilized to supplement those funds <br />which could be made available to the project sponsor <br />from other sources. Under this policy, priority was <br />given to the concept of joint ventures and cost sharing <br />by the project sponsors, the Board, and other state and <br />federal agencies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.