My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00349
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00349
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:14 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:36:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/9/1980
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Members, Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />July 1, 1980 <br />Page two <br /> <br />b. Irrigation (new or supplemental). <br /> <br />c. Drainage. <br /> <br />d. Water quality improvement. <br /> <br />10. Impact on water quality. <br /> <br />11. Contribution to state's resources and economy. <br /> <br />12. Amount of state funds required. <br /> <br />13. Environmental impact. <br /> <br />14. Recreational, fish and wildlife benefits. <br /> <br />It is proposed that the Board initiate a discussion of the proj- <br />ect selection process at its July 8 meeting in order that the staff <br />might have the benefit of the Board's ,thoughts prior to formulating <br />final recollllDendations. The Board could then take final action at the <br />September meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />With the exception of fiscal year 1978-1979, when construction <br />funds were quite limited, the Board has been accepting all applications <br />for feasibility studies on a first come-first served basis. If a <br />proposed project conformed with the project purposes expressed in the <br />statutes and appeared at all to have merit, the staff arranged for the <br />conduct of a feasibility investigation of the project in cooperation <br />with the local sponsoring entity. In the conduct of these feasibility <br />investigations, the staff evaluated findings of fact relating to the <br />criteria outlined above. If, after the completion of such an evalu- <br />ation, the staff concluded that a proposed project was feasible, it was <br />submitted to the Board for approval or disapproval. <br /> <br />The Board has, as required by statute, been submitting its list <br />of recommended projects to the legislature each year with an indication <br />of the prioritization of those projects, The priorities were estab- <br />lished on a yearly basis with no effort being made to re-prioritize <br />pending projects as new ones came in. Priorities have been established <br />based upon an evaluation of the criteria outlined above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.