Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br />1 if we get it approved and then will not construct it. I would <br /> <br />2 be concerned about that greatly. We could say we are going <br /> <br />3 to reconsider it, and we'll get back to them. This bill isn't <br /> <br />4 going to go anywhere till the end of the session. <br /> <br />5 MR. VANDEMOER: Could I also say in this Board comin <br /> <br />6 up with a procedure, and just put it in the record, we will <br /> <br />7 not approve it unless the land is acquired or at least turned <br /> <br />8 to game and recreation purposes. It looks to me, then, like <br /> <br />9 you wouldn't have to have this come--you would have a procedur <br /> <br />10 that just said if you want to have a reservoir, your land is <br /> <br /> <br />11 either game and fish or to some pciblic entity; and it looks <br /> <br /> <br />12 like if Bill had that direction, this thing wouldn't-- <br /> <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: Could that be one of the standards we <br /> <br />are going to look at? It may be that this is perfectly all <br /> <br />right. <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: I'm not taking this as a specific <br /> <br />17 case. I'm taking this as procedure for any reservoir. <br /> <br />18 MR. SPARKS: If I may interject a thought here. As <br /> <br />19 an absolute policy, I don't think you can really do it that <br /> <br />20 way. You have to look at the potential of each reservoir site <br /> <br />21 In every case, what we've tried to do is look at the potential <br /> <br />22 and the need at each particular site. So there are some cases <br /> <br />where you don't want public access or where it could not serve <br /> <br />any purpose. The recreational potential is not there. So you <br /> <br />have to evaluate what the potential and the need for it is and <br />