Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />1 involved. I don't know of anything wrong with it, particularl}; <br /> <br />2 and I urge your support of the project as per the resolution, <br /> <br />3 and I so move. <br /> <br />4 MR. STAPLETON: Is there a second? <br /> <br />5 <br />6 <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Second. <br /> <br />MR. MacFARLANE: I have a question. Where does the <br /> <br />7 northern part of this extend to? <br /> <br />8 MR. LUSTER: It extends to just up south of College <br /> <br />9 Road, if you are familiar with that. <br /> <br />10 <br />11 <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Any further questions of Don? <br /> <br />MR. THOMPSON: Yes, sir. Tommy Thompson. Don men- <br /> <br />12 tioned that one of the ea~ly studies suggested a dam--Fountain <br /> <br />13 Dam and Reservoir, on the Fountain in Pueblo. There were no <br /> <br />14 water rights for the permanent pool, and without a permanent <br /> <br />15 pool it was totally unfeasible. That wasn't a very popular <br /> <br />16 position to take, but we did. In this particular instance, <br /> <br />17 our board has endorsed it due to the fact it is a flow-through <br /> <br />18 control, which is materially important to the people where we <br /> <br />19 are not going to intercept or hold back their water, because <br /> <br />20 the Fountain is tributary to the Arkansas. people down around <br /> <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />LaJunta love to see a flood up around pueblo because they get <br /> <br />the water a few days later. <br /> <br />As Don and Bob mentioned, this project has been well <br /> <br />studied, and I have yet to see a project that has as little <br /> <br />opposition as this. The people on the lower east side didn't <br />