Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />1 guage is in recognition that the project has both advantages <br /> <br />2 and disadvantages. There are costs and benefits associated <br /> <br /> <br />3 with the project. The thought here was that when those costs <br /> <br /> <br />4 are traded of "on balance", it's a good project. That's the <br /> <br /> <br />5 concept I was trying for. <br /> <br /> <br />6 MR. STAPLETON: Any further questions? <br /> <br /> <br />7 MR. GORMLEY: Bob, in his comment, used the words, <br /> <br /> <br />8 "subject to the completion of the EIS." Rather than "pending" <br /> <br />9 would "subject to" perhaps be a little firmer endorsement? <br /> <br />10 pending sounds like a delay. If we say "subject to," it's <br /> <br />11 like saying that when that's done, we have supported it. Per- <br /> <br />12 haps I'm nitpicking, but I wondered if it might make it a little <br />13 firmer. <br />lit <br /> <br />I agree with John and Bob. We are not going to get <br /> <br />15 projects of this size unless we find ways to sell power and <br /> <br />16 other items and have them done by other entities. <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />MR. MacFARLANE: I think subject to better language-- <br />MR. STAPLETON: All right. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: Where is that, now? <br /> <br />MR. MacFARLANE: It's in the "therefore" clause where <br /> <br />it says "pending the completion." Substitute the words "sub- <br /> <br />ject to" for the word "pending." <br /> <br />MR. STAPLE~N: Is that agreeable? <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: Whatever the attorneys say is fine. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: That's what I like to hear. <br />