My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00270
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:34:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/15/1960
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~U/~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />stipulation concerning Green Mountain Reser- <br />voir and, in general, the Blue River decrees. <br />Then we set forth all the correspondence that <br />we thought was pertinent in order to demon- <br />strate some basic conflicts of interest and <br />an interpretation of both the court decrees <br />and Senate Document 80. Now again I'll state <br />that Senate Document 80 - I'll state without <br />hesitation - is one of the worst documents <br />I've ever seen as an operating document for a <br />reservoir. Purportedly it was for the purpose <br />of solving the many problems concerned with <br />the transmountain diversion of the Colorado- <br />Big Thompson Project and so on, but it was <br />left so open and so vague that it was bound <br />to create future difficulties. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In any event, regardless of what con- <br />flicting opinions may exist and will continue <br />to exist concerning Green Mountain, yo~ will <br />recall that Senate Document 80 in effect <br />states that 52,000 acre-feet of storage in <br />Green Mountain Reservoir is reserved for the <br />Colorado-Big Thompson Project for replacement <br />for its transmountain diversion. Now the <br />total capacity of that reservoir is 154,000 <br />acre-feet which leaves 102,000 acre-feet of <br />water unaccounted for. In Senate Document 80 <br />you can arrive at any interpretation you want, <br />depending on what particular place you put <br />your finger in the document, but overall I <br />think it is clear that the primary purpose of <br />the remaining water was for the generation of <br />power to assist in the repayment of the proj- <br />ect cost. And then the document says that <br />this excess water, this 102,000 acre-feet, <br />'shall be released without charge'. Well, I <br />always shudder when I run into something like <br />that in any document. It's the same thing we <br />run into in the John r~artin Reservoir - <br />'shall be released without charge for other <br />appropriators'. Not specifying which ones, or <br />where. So it is somewhat difficult to place <br />a construction, from the document itself, as <br />to what it means. <br /> <br />In any event, there is 102,000 acre-feet <br />of water in the reservoir, (that is, when it <br />is full and it does not always fill), which <br />can be released for beneficial uses andcer- <br />tainly in Colorado on a federal project, we <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.