My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00261
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00261
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:47:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/13/1964
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda, Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that Juniper would be made a part of 485. <br />'!'hey said they didn't know whether the <br />Juniper would be a participating project or <br />whether it would be a storage project but that <br />matter was something that would have to be <br />determined later. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />l1hen 485 came out, this is the paragraph <br />with respect to Juniper, it occurs on page 2 <br />and it's the second paragraph of the copy <br />that I have of Public Law 485: <br /> <br />'The Secretary, concurrently with the <br />investigations directed by the preceding <br />paragraph', (and the preceding paragraph <br />names the projects that were mentioned in <br />485), 'shall also give priority to completion <br />of a planning report on the Juniper Project.'. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The reconnaissance report of the Bureau," <br />I think, came out in July of 1963. I want to <br />go back just a minute to the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin Compact that was made in 1948. It <br />was negotiated in 1948. In that compact, as <br />in all compacts, they had difficulty in getting <br />folks in agreement, and one of the things that <br />brought about the final agreement of the com- <br />pact was that they divided the water of the <br />Yampa River between Utah and Colorado. The <br />Yampa River is a river that is wholly within <br />the State of Colorado. It does not flow in <br />any other state. I took Clifford Stone, who <br />was a very popular, and deservedly popular, <br />water expert, I think it is right to call him <br />a good lawyer and very devoted to the direction <br />that Colorado might take with its water con- <br />servation program, in fact, he was a Director <br />of this Board, I took him to task for the pro- <br />vision in the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />Compact for awarding 5,000,000 acre-feet of <br />water to Utah out of the Yampa River in each <br />ten-year period. He said to me 'Well, that <br />was the price of the compact.'. And he said <br />he didn't think it was so bad because he <br />figured that that insured a reservoir would <br />be built at either Cross Mountain or Juniper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.