Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS': <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON t <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. GEISSINGER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />....v""'J.. <br /> <br />"That is correct. But I am pointing out <br />that the Board must have flexibility insofar <br />as priorities are concerned, because it may <br />be that during next year we are going to have <br />to go into a crash program to provide water <br />for the oil shale industry." <br /> <br />"But shouldn't you alter your previous <br />action when you do that?" <br /> <br />"I would think so. But we had taken no <br />action that we can find on the Juniper Proj- <br />ect in our official minutes and we searched <br />those out thoroughly. The only action that <br />we can find is that it was given second pri- <br />ority in the Yampa River drainage." <br /> <br />"Well, there were three members of this <br />Board that were present when the Board tool. <br />that action and they participated in the <br />action. Bill Nelson was here also. I don't <br />remember whether he took part in this. I <br />know that Mr. Peterson took part in it and <br />Dave Miller and Ted McCandless. All three <br />of them. So there was action taken by this <br />Board with respect to the Juniper." <br /> <br />"There was. ~'1e have the minutes here. <br />There definitely was. t'le have the verbatim <br />minutes of a motion made by Mr. McCandless, <br />seconded by Dean Crawford. This is the only <br />record we find of a specific recommendation <br />on the Juniper Project. This was the one we <br />furnished you under date of February 5, 1964, <br />when we searched the records at your request." <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, we have now taken action <br />concerning the combined Great Northern and <br />Juniper Project, setting forth the priority <br />~2 and I would like to move that this project <br />shall be from now on known as the Juniper <br />Project." <br /> <br />"I'll second that." <br /> <br />"Any discussion on the motion? All those <br />