Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3888 <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MRS. KEATING: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR.S. KEATING: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />11R. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, I was going to bring that <br />matter up. I've been concerned about it for <br />some time. It is my understanding that Con- <br />gress might object - at least the Interior <br />Committee might object - to our listing proj- <br />ects that are not in 485. If we adopt this <br />list today we might have to do some juggling <br />of names and there may have to be an amend- <br />ment passed by Congress to 485 to satisfy <br />the House Interior Affairs Committee's <br />protocol on the matter." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"I'd like to have the Director comment <br />on these matters." <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, may I interrupt and read <br />that motion that 11r. Peterson made, for Nr. <br />Sparks? He was out of the room at that <br />time.n <br /> <br />nYes.1I <br /> <br />"'I would move at this time that the <br />Juniper and Great Northern projects be com- <br />bined in one feasibility investigation and <br />that this project - the combined project - <br />be given the priority #2 on the list'. That <br />was passed." <br /> <br />"Unanimously. .. <br /> <br />"Gentlemen, first, just to set the records <br />straight, the motion that you were talking <br />about on the Juniper Project occurred on <br />September 30, 1957. That was a motion by Mr. <br />McCandless. The wording was: <br /> <br />'I move that the Juniper Project be <br />placed in second place on the priorities in <br />the Yampa-,~ite River basins.' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The motion was seconded by Dean Crawford <br />and was adopted by the Board. <br /> <br />The savery-pot Hook at that time was <br />already first and under way. <br />