Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.rt~~rp ~ <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />"-.>''''''. <br />",..,._-~ <br /> <br />Lt. Colonel Dorothy F. Klasse <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />BASIS FOR BIOLOGICAL OPINION <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ThiS biological opinion addresses an average annual depletion of approximately <br />1409 acre-feet from the San Juan River. Of this amount. 1051 acr~-feet is <br />considered to be new and 388 acre-feet is considered to be historic. New <br />depletions are currently defined as those depletions occurring after <br />December 31. 1982. Historic depletions are currently defined as those <br />occurring prior to January 1. 1983. These cutoff dates are consistent with <br />I <br />dates used to derive the baseline for the Animas-La Plata Project Biological <br />Opinions in 1991 and 1996. The proposed Animas-La Plata Project is the <br />largest recent project that may impact the San Juan River Basin and: <br />therefore. is driving section 7 consultation throughout the San Juan River <br />Basin. <br /> <br />Water depletions in the San Juan River Basin have been recognized as a major <br />source of impact to endangered fish species. Continued water withdrawal has <br />restricted the ability of the San Juan River system to produce flow conditions <br />required by various life stages of the fishes. In 1963. the Navajo Dam was <br />closed. and Navajo Reservoir began to fill with water from the San Juan River. <br />Historically. flows in the San Juan River prior to the Navajo Dam were highly <br />variable and ranged from a low of 44 cubic feet per second (cfs) in September . <br />1956 to a high of 19.790 cfs in May 1941 (mean monthly values) at the U.S. <br />Geological Survey Station 93680000. Shiprock. New Mexico. Conversely, <br />post-Navajo Dam flows in the San Juan River have ranged from a low of 185 cfs <br />in July 1963. while the reservoir was filling, to a high of 9.508 cfs in <br />June 1979. According to the Bureau of Reclamation, since 1963, Navajo Dam has <br />significantly altered flow of the San Juan River by typically storing spring <br />peak flows and releasing water in summer. fall. and winter months resulting in <br />an average decrease in spring peak flows of 45 percent, while approximately <br />doubling winter base flows at the Bluff gauge in Utah. Similar comparisons <br />can be made at the upstream gauges at Shiprock and Farmington. New Mexico. <br />Significant depletions and redistribution of flows of the San Juan River also <br />have occurred as a result of other major water development projects, including <br />Navajo Indian Irrigation Project and the San Juan-Chama Project. These <br />depletions. along with a number of other factors, have resulted in such <br />drastic reductions in the populations of Colorado squawfish and razorback <br />sucker throughout their ranges that the Service has listed these species as <br />endangered and has implemented programs to prevent them from becoming extinct. <br /> <br />The biological opinion issued by Region 6 of the Service on February 26. 1996. <br />for the Animas-La Plata Project found that the proposed development and <br />subsequent depletion of 149.220 acre-feet of the San Juan River's flow would <br />jeopardize the continued existence of the endangered Colorado squawfish and . <br /> <br />\0 <br />