Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\ <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Agenda Item 19d <br />September 12, 1991 <br /> <br />Potential for Injury <br /> <br />The applicants' request to change senior irrigation rights to year round uses may <br />deplete the Board's instream flow rights on the Eagle River at a time and place not <br />historically depleted by those rights. Furthermore, the proposed augmentation sources rnay <br />not replace depletions in the same amount, timing and location at which they occur on the <br />Eagle River and Squaw Creek. Applicants' request for upstream alternate points of <br />diversion may also deplete approximately six miles. of the Eagle River. <br /> <br />Other Objectors <br /> <br />Other objectors include the Union Oil Company of California, Nathan Finkel and the <br />State and Division Engineers. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br /> <br />The staff recommends that the Board ratify the statement of opposition filed in this <br />case to protect the Board's instream flow rights on the Eagle River and Squaw Creek. <br /> <br />DCM/MU/gl <br />Attachment <br /> <br />591CW077.mem <br /> <br />-2- <br />