Laserfiche WebLink
<br />) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Potential for InjUlY <br /> <br />Applicants' proposed augmentation sources may not replace depletions in the same <br />amount, timing and location at which they occur. Additionally, applicants' request for <br />upstream alternate points of diversion may deplete approximately six miles of the Eagle <br />River. <br /> <br />Other Objectors <br /> <br />Other objectors include City of Colorado Springs, Nathan Finkel and the State and <br />Division Engineers. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br /> <br />The staff recommends that the Board ratify the statement of opposition filed in this <br />case to protect the Board's instream flow rights on the Eagle River and Squaw Creek. <br /> <br />DCM/MU/gl <br />Attachment <br /> <br />S91CW078.mem <br /> <br />-2- <br />