Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />25. <br /> <br />Colorado River Decision Support Svstem <br />Authorizations: SB 92-87 Grant Amount: <br />HB 93-1273 <br />SB 94-029 <br />HB 95-1155 <br />SB 96-153 <br />SB 97-008 <br />Total <br /> <br />$ 452,000 <br />$1,420,400 plus $ 250,000 for FTE's <br />$1,744,000 plus $ 250,000 for FrE's <br />$1,980,000 plus $ 342,000 for FTE's <br />$1,400,000 plus $ 480,000 for FTE's <br />$ $ 320.000 for FTE's <br />$6,996,000 plus $1,642,000 for FTE's <br /> <br />Water Source: Colorado River <br />Location: Colorado River Basin & Tributaries <br /> <br />Project Type: Decision Support System <br />Managers: Randy SeaholmlRay Alvarado <br /> <br />The Colorado River Decision Support System (CRDSS) was a multi-year project that began with <br />a feasibility study in 1992. The system was designed and developed over the 1993-98 time frame. The <br />CRDSS is a data centered collection of databases and models which provide improved data, data analysis <br />and decision making capability for many critical Colorado River planning, administrative and operational <br />issues. The CRDSS is centered around databases containing historical information on streamflow, <br />climate and water uses, as well as tabulations of water rights and water management policies. Data are <br />keyed to locations in the river basin using a geographic infomtation system. This computer-based system <br />allows decision-makers to access water resource data, analyze data and simulate potential decisions and <br />policies, examining the potential consequences. CRDSS is 100% complete and has been moved into an <br />operation and maintenance phase. CRDSS is being used as a management tool in all 5 ofthe major river <br />basins that it covers. The remaining fuuds are being used to provide training with a portion bdng <br />reserved to incorporate the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's RiverWare Model when it is determined that a <br />stable PC version of it is available <br /> <br />26. <br /> <br />Lower South Platte Water Management and Storage Sites Investigation and Sustain Studv <br />Authorization: SB 01-157, aB 00-1419 GrantAmount: $550,000 <br />Water Source: South Platte River Project Type:Multi-Use Water Planning <br />Location: Logan and Sedgwick Project Manager: Rick Brown <br /> <br />In the summer of 2000, the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) acting through the <br />Water Supply Protection Section completed a Reconnaissance Level Study of Water Management and <br />Storage Sites in the lower South Platte River. The CWCB authorized up to $140,000 to complete the <br />reconnaissance study and the final cost was approximately $138,000. The initial results of the study <br />indicated several potential projects, which warranted future investigation and the CWCB authorized <br />funding to conduct a feasibility level study of these "preferred altemative(s)", and if warranted, to <br />complete an engineering design ofthe selected alternative(s). <br /> <br />The overall purpose of the project is to identify water management and storage options in the <br />lower South Platte River that could facilitate Colorado's management of South Platte flows, including <br />coordination with ground water recharge projects for in-state beneficial uses, such as water right and <br />South Platte River Compact administration and providing benefits for biological species of concern iu <br />Colorado, and for participation in an endangered species program being developed pursuant to the Platte <br />River Cooperative Agreement <br /> <br />Shortly after CWCB authorization of the project, staff and management were approached by <br />representatives of the Ground Water Appropriators of the South Platte (GASP), one of the potential <br />beneficiaries of a future project, and were asked to delay the feasibility study because of a pending water <br />right filing. The sensitivity of the water right filing and GASP's desire to implement one of the <br />alternatives identified in the reconnaissance study lead staff and management to conclude that it would be <br /> <br />Page 14 of31 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />