BOARD00226 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I We have a number of serious objections to the criteria as proposed. Under date of March 4th I submitted to the Board a memorandum which set forth the operating criteria and the changes which we have proposed. We suggested some amend- ments to the position of the Upper Colorado River Commission. In general, those were adopted by the Commission at its meeting last Friday. The revised position of the Commission is included along with other items in your folders. I think at this point it would be appropriate for the Board, if it so desires, to endorse this position. Rather than going through all of the criteria I will simply go through that portion of the criteria which was modified.after it was sent to the members of the Board. On page 14 of the 'Comments and Recommendations of Colo- rado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming' at the lower half of the page, Article II(2) of the proposed criteria. The original criteria specified that it was a purpose of the criteria to provide storage in Lake Powell to protect the Upper Basin against future deliveries at Lee Ferry. The other condition was as specified in the congressional act. If Lake Powell is below the capacity of Lake Mead the act specifies that it must be increased so that it contains as much water as Lake Mead and vice versa. I The criteria as proposed by the Secretary states that if either of these conditions exist and more water is needed to protect the upper Basin from deliveries at Lee Ferry, or Lake Powell is below the level of Lake Mead, then the deliveries at Lee Ferry will be re- duced to a minimum of 8.23 million acre-feet. In other words, the filling criteria proposed by the Secretary clearly contemplate that at no time would the delivery at Lee Ferry ever be less than 8.23 million acre-feet. When added to the flow of the Paria River which is a part of the Lee Ferry flow but measured separately, this totals 8.25 million acre-feet.