My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00198
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/15/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I only say that we must take the broad <br />view, we must do the best we can for Color ado <br />with the waters we have. We're down to the <br />last waterhole: there's no argument about it, <br />we'll have to face it. And we are going to <br />have to use our water more carefully, spread <br />it thinner and get the ultimate out of it, with <br />as little waste as possible. I know, as well <br />as all of you fellows who are here who have <br />been associated with the farming practices, <br />that you absolutely cannot divert water from <br />a stream and apply it to farmland without a <br />reasonable small operational loss. It just <br />cannot be done. The point now is how best <br />can we put all of the waters to use without <br />flagrant waste, without losses at the state <br />line? To give you a specific instance, with <br />some more wells in the lower South Platte <br />Valley I can totally supply the needs below <br />about Sterling, without one drop of water <br />being diverted from the stream. I can do <br />the same thing in. the Arkansas Valley below <br />perhaps the City of Lamar without a drop of <br />water being delivered from the stream. At <br />the present day we are capturing and storing <br />every drop of water in the South Platte River <br />from above Denver to about the Morgan-Washing- <br />ton County line in Off-channel reservoirs. <br />Then there is 250 cubic feet per second, 500 <br />acre-feet a day, going across the state line <br />into Nebraska which We are losing. We should <br />have some means of holding that back for use <br />next summer. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We need some reservoirs. We need to <br />allow our people with groundwater uses to <br />amalgamate their ground water uses with their <br />ditch waters. I take this view - every per- <br />son who has a decreed water right to supply a <br />block of irrigated land through a canal sys- <br />tem, perhaps in conjunction with a reservoir <br />system, is entitled to divert and put to use <br />the full amount of his decreed water rights, <br />be it from stream, ditch, reservoir or by <br />pumping from underground supplies. As jim <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.