Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CALIFORNIA: IRRIGATION WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SYNOPSIS <br /> <br />H:.story <br /> <br />This program was formed in the 1975-75 fiscal year by merging the <br />Water Use Program (created in 1954 under Section 266E of the State Wat.er Coae) <br />and the More Effective Use of Water Program that began in 1973. <br /> <br />In the 1981-82 fiscal year, this activity was separated out as an <br />independent component. <br /> <br />In April 1981, the S',ffiCB granted $1,290,000 in Proposition 2 Bond <br />Funds (State Assistance Program) for three approved agricultural water <br />conservation projects to be initiated :n fiscal year 1981-82. One of these <br />projects was completed by the end of fiscal year 1983-84, the second by. the end <br />of fiscal year 1984-85, and the third in fiscal year 1985-86. In January 1985, <br />$273,000 in unspent Proposition 2 Funds were approved by the State Water <br />Resources COntrol Board to fund the Westside Drainage Reduction Program. <br /> <br />In July 1982, a shift of data gathering and analytical activities from <br />the Urban Water Conservation Component to the Agricultural Water COnservation <br />and Planning Component was instituted. .!hese planning programs were <br />incorporated in a new component entitled ~fectiveness of Conservation <br />Practices and Programs, which has now become part of the Technology Transfer <br />element of this component. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In July 1983, the landscape programs relating to irrigation management <br />of large expanses of turf were added to the Agricultural Water Conservation <br />ccmponent. <br /> <br />In November 1983, responsibility for the management of the In-School <br />Education Program element was delegated from the Urban Water Conservation <br />Branch. The program, renamed Water Education, is now an element of this <br />component. <br /> <br />Need <br /> <br />Improvi:"lg the efficiency with which water is used in certain areas of <br />California makes water available for new and beneficial purposes. This already <br />developed water can contribute to new jobs, more industry, greater agricultural <br />output, and generally, to growth of the econCllllY. <br /> <br />DWR planning studies1!indicate that approximately 643,000 acre- <br />feet of water are potentially conservable through improved agricultural water <br />management. Furthermore, water supply savings are possible in the urban sector <br />throu~~ improved irrigation management of turf. <br /> <br />In addition, public water agencies, private water purveyors, and local <br />governments are all concerned with practicing sound fiscal management to help <br />solve local water problem:l. More efficient use of water often results inmonetary savings. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1/ Dw~ Bulletin 100-83 <br /> <br />1114 <br />