My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00196
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:33:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/29/1955
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />-g33 <br /> <br />"I <br /> <br />But when it comes to dividing up the Anticipated <br />Credits from Power Profits during the first 71 years of <br />Glen Canyon operation, Colorado receives $16,595,700, <br />Utah $90,246,500, Wyoming $33,761,300, and New Mexico <br />$215,258,400. At least that is the way S500 enacted by <br />the Senate in the last Session in effect allocates those <br />credits. If you were Governor of Colorado, would you stand <br />for it? <br /> <br />Under my proposal Utah would <br />Credit of 98 million, Wyoming, 60 <br />million and Colorado 220 million. <br />need power credits desperately to <br />water to beneficial use, but I am <br />willing to give New Mexico enough <br />her total up to $100 Million. <br /> <br />receive a Glen Canyon <br />million, New Mexico 48 <br />Colorado and New Mexico <br />put their Colorado River <br />certain Colorado would be <br />power credits to bring <br /> <br />Just today IvaI V. Goslin, Engineer-Secretary <br />Upper Colorado River Commission, presented me with <br />bill for the fiscal year beginning July 1st, 1956. <br />the way he stated it: <br /> <br />Colorado <br />New Mexico <br />Utah <br />Wyoming <br /> <br />51.75~ <br />11.25~ <br />23.0Wo <br />14.0Wo <br />100 % <br /> <br />of the <br />this <br />This is <br /> <br />$38,618,54 <br />8,395.34 <br />17,163.79 <br />10,447.53 <br />$74,625.20 <br /> <br />When the expenses and the losses in the Basin are <br />allocated, Colorado is given 5l.75~, but when the benefits <br />are divided, Colorado receives 4~. You and our other <br />neighbors are too fair and squre to short change Colorado <br />in that way. <br /> <br />There is no one in Colorado so far as I know who is <br />opposed to the earliest possible construction of Central <br />Utah and all the other Projects in all the other States, <br />but what we in Colorado do object to, is allocating any <br />of the Anticipated Power Credits of Glen Canyon to any <br />State until an equitable division of~hosecredits among <br />all four states has been made. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />With all good wishes, I am <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />/s/ Ed C. Johnson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.