Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. 1 <br />2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 <br /> 18 <br /> 19 <br /> 20 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 <br />. 24 <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 29 <br /> 30 <br /> 31 <br /> 32 <br /> 33 <br /> 34 <br /> 35 <br /> 36 <br /> 37 <br /> 38 <br /> 39 <br /> 40 <br /> 41 <br /> 42 <br /> 43 <br /> 44 <br /> 45 <br />. 46 <br /> <br />CWCB Ag Workshop, 1/22/02 <br />Draft Meeting Notes <br /> <br /> <br />Start 13: 11 <br /> <br />Note: This is not a verbatim transcription, but a general summary of what was said, <br />trying to use as many original phrases as possible. <br /> <br />Harold Miskel: Welcome everyone, We have a couple more speakers we're going to try <br />and fit in as we go along. I ask all the speakers to be as succinct as possible so there's <br />enough time to ask questions and have a general discussion at end of the day. If there are <br />other people who aren't on the agenda that want to speak, if we have time at the end we <br />will let them, Rod, you have any other comments? <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich: Hope everyone has seen the agenda, We hope to take in information <br />today and at the end of the day deliberate where we want to go with a policy statement. It <br />won't be final at this time, but want it to address any concerns we may have, Dan <br />McAuliffe and I will be the editors, and will bring topics of concern back to the Board. <br />Greg Walcher will make the opening remarks. Looking in the audience, I'm glad there's <br />a lot of people here who have an interest in the matters being discussed today. Greg, <br /> <br />Greg Walcher: Let me thank the members ofthis Board for holding this forum, There <br />are very few places in government where two seemingly different agencies such as water <br />and agriculture come together, other than agriculture needs water to farm. But there are <br />interests that affect both of them, In Colorado there is a synergy between these two <br />agencies. Always has been, because they're the people who deal with water on a day to <br />day basis. There is a good relationship between the two, and in Colorado State <br />Government it is especially good, Don Ament and I have worked hard together for 3- <br />years, worked on many groups together. Lot of issues really effect both departments and <br />working together is important. There are many of reasons why CWCB and Agriculture <br />should be worried about agriculture in Colorado. Agriculture is absolutely critical to <br />Colorado's economy, not just Holyoke and Meeker, but to Denver as well. Agriculture is <br />the 2nd largest industry in Colorado. No question, it contributes hugely to the economy of <br />Colorado. From an environmental perspective, Agriculture is one of the best ways to <br />manage the environment, historically many of mans actions have always made the <br />environment worse, but in Colorado man has done the opposite, made the desert bloom <br />and created the breadbasket of the nation, <br /> <br />How we get water out of the ground and into agriculture has created one of our biggest <br />problems. Conventional wisdom says the era of water projects is over, but I disagree. <br />There is no answer to flood or drought other than more water storage. That's what the <br />CWCB is about.. ,Coloradoans have agreed to tax themselves to get water. We've <br />evolved to a point where we really have a couple of glaring issues facing to us, where are <br />we going to get water to supply our ever growing cities, and the other is drying up <br />farmlands. In general terms, state government believes it is bad policy to dry up farms to <br />water cities. It is bad policy, bad for Colorado, and bad for the environment. But if we <br />