My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00158
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/12/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Some explanation of the salinity standards is in order. In the first <br />place, the word, "salinity" is misleading in that the actual criteria <br />is not salinity per se, but total dissolved solids, which means that <br />the so-called salinity standards include a wide variety of various <br />chemical compounds. To the average person, salinity means salt that I <br />we use in everyday life, that is, sodium chloride. Yesterday I <br />received a letter from a lady stating that in her opinion most of <br />the salinity came from salt being put on the highways by the State <br />Highway Department. That does contribute some to the salinity of <br />the various rivers, but is not a significant amount in terms of total <br />dissolved solids which are carried in the Colorado River. <br /> <br />The principal constituent of total dissolved solids in the Colorado <br />River is not salt in the normal sense, that is, sodium chloride. The <br />principal constituents are calcium compounds; namely, calcium car- <br />bonate and calcium sulfate, with calcium carbonate being the pre- <br />dominant of all the chemical compounds which occur in the Colorado <br />River. <br /> <br />I will recite some background as far as the agreement with Mexico is <br />concerned and what it means. In 1961, the Well ton-Mohawk project, <br />a division of the Gila project in Arizona, began operation. From <br />that project, which is a Bureau of reclamation project, considerable <br />amoUnts of saline water were pumped from the ground under the Wellton- <br />Mohawk project, which is near Yuma, Arizona. That water was dis- <br />charged into the Colorado River above the international boundary. The <br />purpose of that pumping was to get rid of the highly saline waters <br />under the Well ton-Mohawk lands and to replace those waters with water <br />of a better quality from the Colorado River. This started the prob- <br />lem with Mexico because the water coming from that project was about <br />5,000 parts per million, and did create some problems in Mexico. <br /> <br />That started negotiations between the United States and Mexico leading <br />to the agreement contained in the Minute 242 executed in Mexico City <br />on August 30, 1973. By that agreement, the United States agreed <br />that by not later than July 1, 1974, the United States will adopt <br />appropriate measures to insure that the waters of the Colorado River <br />delivered to Mexico shall not contain an annual salinity of more I <br />than 115 parts per million over that water which arrives at Imperial <br />Dam. The Minute 242 or the proposed regulation of the EPA does not <br />define the quality at Imperial Dam. However, from public statements <br />made by Mexican officials, they assume that the agreed upon figure <br />'was not to exceed 865 parts per million. That is the understanding <br />upon which Mexico executed the agreement. <br /> <br />This simply means that between Imperial Darn near Yuma and delivery at <br />the international boundary the salinity of the river can increase by <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.