My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00158
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/12/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />of when he was <br />tion projects. <br />million dollar <br />confused or we <br /> <br />talking about these construction funds and construc- <br />I assumed that he was talking about this other ten <br />fund project program and I am just wondering if I am <br />are mixing things. <br /> <br />~tr. Stapleton: Well, I thought they were completely separate, but <br />Larry will have to answer that. <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: Yes, they are completely separate. <br /> <br />Mr. Ten Eyck: I am aware of that. <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: We have already adopted the policy on the construction <br />fund. The only thing I was pointing out was that some of these <br />experimental things may lead into the construction fund. <br /> <br />Mr. Ten Eyck: That is another possibility, but the way you described <br />the use of consultants and the use of staff and discussed the con- <br />struction fund, the construction program, I was confused. And I want <br />to find out if we were still specifically relating to comments to <br />this item 5. If so, we are not with it. <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: Item 5 is to determine if the board wants to pursue a <br />policy of this type on the basis that each project be submitted to <br />the board for a decision before we request the legislature for money. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Even though you are not asking for any funds, I think <br />we ought to have a concurrence in the Joint Budget Committee that <br />they would cooperate if the projects met certain tests, and so forth. <br />If they are not interested in it, we are up against a stone wall. I <br />think if you feel that they are, you can explore it when you have <br />your budget hearings this year. <br /> <br />Mr. Ten Evck: I think you have a chicken and egg situation here. <br />Somebody has to go first. I think the Joint Budget Committee has <br />given enough indication that if Larry can show them a policy that the <br />board has agreed upon, it will consider the funding. I think that <br />is what Larry wants from members of the board. <br /> <br />11r. Cornelius: Larry, do you want a motion that we approve . . . ? <br /> <br />11r. Stapleton: I don't think you need a motion. Is it the consensus <br />of the board that they proceed to provide us criteria and guidelines <br />for a program for experimental projects? Isn't that what you want? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: Yes. <br /> <br />-19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.