My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00158
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/12/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />County area. <br /> <br />Mr. Cornelius: Larry, I just happen to have the final repor't to the <br />Four Corners Regional Commission project on the Grand Valley dem- <br />onstration project where we assisted the Water Board. I have given <br />it to the members of the board. <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: Part of the funds that we utilized were from the Four <br />Corners Commission. The legislature appropriated some funds to the <br />board to carryon the work that Mr. Longley is doing. You will <br />recall at the Glenwood Springs meeting that one of our farm cooper- <br />ators made a statement to the board to the effect that where he used <br />to irrigate for ten days that as a result of the automated irrigation <br />that was installed in cooperation with Mr. Longley, he was able to <br />cut that irrigation to two and a half days. We think this is a very <br />substantial improvement in the irrigation practice. This type of <br />exploratory program should be expanded to all irrigated acreages, <br />not only in the Colorado River, but we think eventually in the South <br />Platte and the Arkansas as well. <br /> <br />The salinity standards have to be applied under the law to all rivers <br />in Colorado, not just to the Colorado, but to the Arkansas, the Rio <br />Grande and the South Platte as well. We will have a long continuing <br />problem. We are hoping that the work we are doing on the Colorado <br />River will be equally applicable to all other irrigated acreages in <br />Colorado. <br /> <br />The Arkansas River at the stateline in Colorado is about four times <br />as bad as the Colorado River. So this is a problem that we must <br />face for the indefinite future. The EPA, under the act of Congress <br />passed last year, is required to establish salinity standards for <br />all rivers in the United States. Why they picked on the Colorado <br />first, we don't know. 1 have a strong hunch that it was connected <br />with the Mexican problem. The Colorado River, to the best of my <br />knowledge, is the first river to be singled out under the 1972 act <br />for the establishment of salinity standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Kroeqer: Larry, you indicate that these standards that EPA has <br />handed down are pretty much based on the agreement with Mexico. How- <br />ever, I was at a meeting recently where it was brought out that the <br />EPA standards for the Arkansas were much more lenient. Is there a <br />rather arbitrary way in which they go about this? Do we have any <br />say so or comeback in that matter? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: We have never agreed, and I don't think the state of <br />Colorado should ever agree at this point in history, that 865 parts <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.