My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00158
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/12/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Where do <br />the Grand Junction area, <br /> <br />. , <br />the greatest problems occur? I gather in <br />from reading some of the memorandums? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: This bill that I refer to, 774, would authorize the <br />immediate construction of three projects. The projects would be the <br />LaVerkin Springs in Utah, a natural springs; Paradox Valley in Colo- <br />rado, which also is a natural point discharge area; and the Grand <br />Valley, which would be to control the salts originating from irriga- <br />tion practices there. For LaVerkin Springs we have some misgivings, <br />because this would require a desalination plant. <br /> <br />In the Paradox Valley, the investigations there have shown a little <br />different situation than we originally thought. The Dolores River <br />flows across an enormous salt dome. That salt dome in places is as <br />much as a mile thick. We originally believed that the flow of surface <br />water over that salt dome was causing the heavy salinity contribution <br />to the Dolores River. However, more detailed investigations have <br />revealed that most of the salt contribution is from ground water that <br />is seeping up through the salt dome and getting into the river. Some <br />tests on that salinity of that water have run as high as 260,000 <br />parts per million, which is an incredible concentration of salt. It <br />is many, many times over the salinity of the ocean. <br /> <br />It appears that we could develop a feasible project by lowering the <br />ground water table and preventing the escape of the ground water into <br />the river and then evaporating that water by the construction of a <br />large offchannel reservoir. This would require a reservoir of sub- <br />stantial capacity, probably somewhere in the magnitude of 70,000 acre- <br />feet, in order to get the amount of water pumped out in equilibrium <br />with evaporation. This appears to us to be a very promising project <br />because it would not require a desalination plant. It would require <br />the construction of a sizable reservoir, but the pumping costs for <br />the water would be very small as compared to the operation of a <br />desalination plant. We think that this is a must for an authorized <br />project. That is under the jurisdiction of Mr. Wiscombe's office in <br />Durango. His office has been doing the feasibility investigation on <br />the project. <br /> <br />We think the Grand Valley is a feasible project. The Grand Valley <br />area does contribute substantial amounts of salt to the river. How <br />much can be attributed to irrigation and how much from natural <br />sources, no one knows at this time. That is part of the investigation <br />being done by this board in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation <br />and other federal agencies to determine how much salt reduction could <br />be achieved with canal linings and on-farm improvements in irrigation <br />efficiency. It appears that as much as 300,000 tons of salt could be <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.