My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00146
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:45:39 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:32:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/30/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />";'11-- <br />II i ,',C <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Riter: "You know, as a Bureau, we make our plans <br />each year and then carry them through. Mr. Larson was <br />not expecting to inspect DeBeque at all. Mr. Hill, last <br />summer, mentioned the DeBeque reservoir and then when <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board seemed to favor it <br />Mr. Larson shifted his program. Of course, we in the <br />Bureau receive funds each year to spend over the 17 states. <br />We carry that program out. In the past the Director <br />of the Colorado Water Conservation Board has been <br />Chairman of the Steering Committee. That Steering <br />Committee exercised a great deal of pressure on how that <br />money was spent. The emphasis in the past, as you know, <br />has been on basin-type studies. Colorado has watched <br />investigations. As far as we are concerned, we will <br />work with the Board. I think Mr. Larson has written <br />Mr. Crawford a letter, suggesting another possibility <br />to look into. Whatever information we have at the <br />hearings, we will present. There are some things we <br />are looking into right now." <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: "Would that conflict with Mr. Peterson's <br />idea?" <br /> <br />Mr. Riter: "Yes, Mr. Larson is looking into both schemes." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Tipton: "I would like to emphasize the last thing that <br />Breitenstein said, review briefly what"this Board has done <br />since it has been in existence since 1937. It became a <br />leader in the West in water. The Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board spearheaded several movements. <br />Through its Director and advisors, it started a movement <br />in Arizona to get Arizona to ratify the Compact. <br />Arizona did so. That removed that cloud over water <br />rights. The next cloud was the use of Colorado River <br />water by Mexico. Mexico was increasing its use rapidly, <br />but so long as the quantity was indefinite, what quantity <br />did the U. S. have to deliver? Colorado did some awfully <br />hard work to get the work sta.ted and to begin negotiations <br />of a treaty. All states agreed except California and <br />Nevada. The treaty was negotiated well within the terms. <br />Colorado spearheaded the passing of the treaty by the <br />Senate. . Colorado was a leader in that. We have the <br />Upper Colorado River Compact. That was the last thing <br />that was necessary to quiet title. The water supply <br />itself was always uncertain. We came to the end of the <br />road. Having fixed up every state in the upper states, <br />we come to the pay-off and now it appears we have nothing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.