Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />financial assistance, and we, therefore, never recover <br /> <br />the feasibility study costs which we have contributed. <br /> <br /> <br />In light of the small amounts involved with these <br /> <br /> <br />particular projects and in light of the fact that the <br /> <br /> <br />contracts that we entered into at the time made no <br /> <br />provision whatsoever for the replacement of feasibility <br /> <br />study costs unless there was follow-up construction with <br /> <br /> <br />financial assistance from the Soard, I think it's a <br /> <br /> <br />matter that is moot for those three projects. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: Okay. <br />MR. KROEGER: Are there other comments? All in favor <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of the motion aye. Opposed, no. <br />(Vote taken.) <br /> <br />t1R. McDONALD: Okay. If you could continue to look <br /> <br /> <br />at the bill, turn back to what is numbered page 3. Uhile <br /> <br /> <br />I'm at it, by way of information, let me just point out <br /> <br /> <br />some changes that have been made by the legislature to <br /> <br /> <br />our original recommendations. <br /> <br /> <br />Priority No.4, Beaver Park, which is down in the <br /> <br /> <br />vicinity of Penrose; the staff had recommended to the. Soa d <br /> <br /> <br />and the Board had subsequently adopted the staff recom- <br /> <br /> <br />mendation that we participate 50 percent in the total <br /> <br /> <br />cost of that project. <br /> <br /> <br />That 50 percent would be $315,000. As you can see, <br /> <br />the legislature by virtue of a House committee amendment <br /> <br />. <br />