Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />to three -- two or three conditions being fulfilled. One <br /> <br />was the completion of the feasibility study to our <br />satisfaction. <br /> <br />The second conceTIled the question of the public <br /> <br />access. which in tUTIl related to the claim to recreationa <br /> <br /> <br />benefits and the economic analysis of the project. which <br /> <br /> <br />in tUTIl ~elated to the question of windfall profits to <br /> <br /> <br />the private landmvners. <br /> <br />The way that issue has tentatively been resolved to <br /> <br />the staff's satisfaction -- and I was not going to report <br /> <br />on it in length because we're still drafting paper. Let <br /> <br />me indicate briefly. and we'll report in length next <br /> <br />time, that the three property owners involved will give <br /> <br />a conservation easement to the Board, which will prevent <br /> <br />private resort kinds of developments around that lake. <br /> <br />So they really can't gain any subdivision <br />advantages by virtue of that. <br />HR. JACKSON: Subject to your approval of the <br />easement? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. McDONALD: Certainly, and that's what I'll bring <br /> <br />back to the Board in the way of an actual draft of <br />a legal instrument. <br /> <br />HR. JACKSON: If you get that I'd say we're in good <br /> <br />shape. <br />MR. McDONALD: It seemed to us to be a reasonable <br />