Laserfiche WebLink
<br />15 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />the -- both the State Engineer and the Water Conservation <br /> <br /> <br />Board staff has been kept entirely current and we have <br /> <br /> <br />no misunderstanding or disagreement at any point, for <br />once. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />HR. VANDEHOER: Hr. Chairman, I'd move for the <br /> <br />inclusion of the Prospect Dam. <br />HR. GOm.~EY: Seconded. <br />HR. KROEGER: Okay. It's moved and seconded. Is <br /> <br />there any further discussion? All in favor, aye. <br /> <br />Opposed, no. <br />(Vote taken.) <br /> <br />HR. JACKSON: Mr. Chairman, I have a question for <br /> <br />Bill. As the legislature makes changes, like Beaver Park, <br /> <br />and others, or as the projects become more or less <br /> <br />expensive, if we're up near the limit of what we have to <br /> <br />spend, how do we adapt to that? <br />MR. HcDONALD: Up near to the limit, Bob, of an <br />individual project or in terms of the total amount of <br />money? <br />MR. JACKSON: Let's say that Beaver Park -- it <br /> <br />doesn't in this instance, but let' 5 say that the project <br /> <br />changed by the legislature in their considerations <br /> <br />exceeds the total amount we have to spend at that particu <br /> <br />lar point. <br />What do you do? Just go down the priority list? <br /> <br />. <br />