My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00073
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00073
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:44:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/16/1949
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />141 <br /> <br />On motion duly seconded, the minutes of the meeting of <br />April 25-26, 1949 of the Colorado Water Conservation Board were <br />approved. <br /> <br />Item l(e) of the Agenda relating to the appointment of a Chief <br />Engineer of the Foard's staff was taken up. The Director reported results of a <br />study made by a committee previously appointed by the Board, and the results of <br />some interviews with prospective candidates. 1;any prospects were unqualified for <br />the position, and the qualified engineers were umvilling to accept the State's low <br />salary limitation. The Director reported that, as a result of the vacancy in the <br />position of Chief Engineer, Mr. Tipton had voluntarily served the Board in a dual <br />capacity, as consulting engineer and as acting supervisor of the engineering depart- <br />ment, in cooperation with R. M. Gildersleeve, ranking member of the office staff of <br />engineers. <br /> <br />Mr. Tipton informed the Board that in addition to interviewing candi- <br />dates who had made application, the committee had made contacts of its own with <br />persons considered qualified for the work, and reported that these prospects de- <br />clined state employment for three reasons (1) already 'working at salary greater than <br />State could offer; (2) reluctance to forfeit seniority, security and retirement ad- <br />vantages built up in present employment; and (3) present position often provided <br />better professional interest, namely, broader opportunities than seen in the state <br />position. Mr. Tipton said that the field of available, qualified candidates had <br />finally narrowed to one, a Mr. John R. EriCkson, nOw employed in the State of New <br />Mexico, who formerly, and for a period of about nine years, was an engineer employed <br />by the L:olorado -Water Conservation Board. Mr. Erickson left Bolorado employment <br />for a better salary and other reasons; and in his present wor~ in New Mexico is <br />receiYing $7,200 annually. <br /> <br />The Director said Mr. Erickson was interested in the Colorado position <br />, only if details of his employment were cleared locally first, namely, sa~isfactory <br />reaction in.the Water Board engineering staff, approyal of Civil Service and other <br />State officials, and assurance of a salary in proportion to his present earnings. <br />The Director reported that the initial step of State salary for the position was <br />not sufficient to be an inducement in the emploJcment of a chief engineer, but that <br />effort could be made to secure Civil Seryice approYal for a higher step rating, <br />with $6,900 being proposed. The Director said he hoped the Board wou:j.d approve and <br />authorize such approach, and if approyed, the proposition would be presented to the <br />Civil Service Commission and the Governor, for review. <br /> <br />On motion by L. Ward Barmister, seconded by Mr. Beaty <br />it was voted that the Director be authorized to negotiate with <br />Mr. Erickson on the possible appointment as chief engineer at a <br />recommended salary of $6,900 a year, after conferring with Civil <br />Service and after ascertaining that such appointment will not <br />interfere with desirable Colorado-New Mexico relations. <br /> <br />The yote was unanimous, except that Attorney General <br />Metzger stated that he was not voting. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith nominated George J. Bailey for the office <br />of Vice Chairman of the Board. The nomination was seconded by <br />Mr. Beaty. Nominations were declared closed, and on vote being <br />taken, Mr. Bailey was declared unanimously elected to succeed <br />himself as Vice Chairman of the Board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.