My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00054
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:43:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1998
Description
ISF Section - Acceptance of Injury with Mitigation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />',,\'- <br /> <br />".~'"'1 <br />",.~" -" <br />....,:." <br />',if,: <br /> <br />Mill Creek and Cornet Creek is necessary to meet the Town's future <br />commitments. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />SMVC's Comment (1/14/98 letter): <br /> <br />The minimum streamflow should not be allowed to be <br />reduced below 0.5 cfs below the confluence of Bear Creek and the <br />San Miguel River. <br /> <br />Towns's Response: <br /> <br />The Town's water rights application has no adverse impact <br />on the instream flow right reach below the confluence with Bear <br />Creek. The Town's proposed mitigation will benefit this reach by <br />reducing reliance on direct diversions from streams in favor of <br />storage. However, the Town does not have an obligation to monitor <br />flows that are not being impacted by its water rights application. <br /> <br />Jacobson's Comment (12/15/97 fax): <br /> <br />"On the overall front, it is not clear that the Town <br />needs the water ... Conservation during Bluegrass Festival will <br />eliminate the one time of year' when water may be truly scare <br />[sic] . " <br /> <br />Town's Response: <br /> <br />. The Town's need for additional water supplies is clear. <br />The recommendation by the Town's: consultants to develop an <br />additional source of municipal water supply' was not predicated on <br />shortages expected during' festival weekends but rather, upon <br />sustained water shortages expected September through March of dry <br />years. The reliable yield during late summer and fall of Mill <br />Creek and Cornet Creek is not sufficient to sustain additional <br />population. The consultants' findings indicated that the Town must <br />develop an additional source of municipal water supply independent <br />of festival weekend activities. ' <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Town has adopted conservation measures which will be <br />implemented on a year-round basis. However, the water savings <br />resulting from implementation of conservation measures will not <br />produce sufficient water to meet the Town's commit:ments within its <br />existing service area. Therefore, an additional water supply is, <br />needed. <br /> <br />Jacobson's Comment (1/13/98 fax}: <br /> <br />CWCB should examine the possible construction of a pump <br />back system on the San Miguel River to h~lp maintain minimum <br />streamflows. The pump back would: extend from Society Turn to just <br />below the Bridal Veil powerhouse. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />t"'T I~T.J <br /> <br />...'......000 nl OC'O C"'....... ('"'1')("'''.''''01 1'::1 v=!lln",.., e~.1 ~.J J..,,,..,T oc. ClI:::'7 !roJI-li <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.