Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-. <br /> <br />first stage of construction were completed. In turn, the <br />invitation for bids on the first stage was not issued until <br />August, 1979. Further delay was encountered when the Bureau <br />obtained an ex tent ion of time for the awarding of the contract <br />from the bidders. As a consequence, a construction contract was <br />not awarded to the successful bidder until December, 1979, nearly <br />three years after the repayment contract was negotiated and <br />executed. . <br /> <br />Once initiated, construction on the first stage proceeded on <br />schedule. However, the Bureau has lost the better part of <br />another year in initiating construction on stage two due to <br />delays incurred in 1981 in the preparation of final designs and <br />specifications for the balance of the project. <br /> <br />During all of these delays, none of which were caused by the <br />Tri-County Water Conservancy District, design changes and <br />inflation have increased the cost of construction beyond that <br />which could have been reasonably foreseen at the time the <br />repayment contract was approved in late 1976. Tb make matters <br />worse, the contractor on stage one has submitted claims totalling <br />nearly $17 million against a contract which in the first place <br />was for only $15 million. While negotiations between the Bureau <br />and the contractor will undoubtedly lead to a substantial <br />reduction in the $17 million of Claims, one cannot help but <br />observe that Tri-County is a victim of problems created by others <br />which are entirely beyond its control. <br /> <br />The repayment contract executed by Tri-County provides, in <br />Article 6. c., that: <br /> <br />The Contractor hereby agrees to pay all <br />project costs allocated to M&I use, including <br />interest during construction, but not more <br />than $38 million. Said obligation limit is <br />the current estimated project cost allocated <br />to.M&I use, based on January 1, 1976, price <br />levels and fiscal year 1976 interest rates <br />increased to cover possible changes in the <br />cost of construction, increases in the <br />applicable rate of interest, changes in <br />project works, or changes in the allocation <br />of project water. The estimated cost based <br />on January 1976 price levels and fiscal year <br />1976 interest rates is $27,966,000. The <br />allocated M&I repayment obligation is based <br />on furnishing 28,100 acre-feet annually of <br />pro; ect M&I water and is to be paid wi th <br />revenues received from project M&I water <br />users and in accordance with sub-article d. <br />hereof. . . . <br /> <br />-2- <br />