My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00034
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:42:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:31:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/23/2005
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'J <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1? Arlc~n~::l~ nr01mnW:.:ttf';TTT~~r~ A~c::()r.l::1t;()n - W;:ltp,r Rie}1tc::/AnEJ11AntMlcm/(;::Il1::11 Wnrk- <br /> <br />Authorization: Construction Fund <br />Water Source: Arkansas River <br />Terms of Loan: $970,448 @250% for 30-years <br /> <br />County: Pueblo <br />Project Yield: 703 Acre-feet <br />Project Type: Water Rights/Canal <br /> <br />This project involves the purchase of785 shares of Excelsior Ditch for replacement water to <br />offset out-of-priority depletions from well pumping. The project also involves the construction of a <br />15-acre recharge pond and enlarging the Excelsior Ditch for approximately 4 miles. The ditch <br />work has been completed and the construction of the recharge ponds is approximately 95% <br />complete. The entire project is anticipated to be operational by September of2005. <br /> <br />1'\ Orph"n Well, ofWievn,- Allvnent"tion Projed <br /> <br />Authorization: Construction Fund <br />Water Source: South Platte Basin <br />Terms of Loan: $1,037,700 @25% for 30-years <br /> <br />County: Morgan <br />Project Yield: 6,000 acre-feet <br />Project Type: Well Augmentation <br /> <br />The Orphan Wells of Wiggins is a new company comprised of 31 separate agricultural <br />operators that own 45 wells which irrigated approximately 4500 acres of fannland. This proj ect <br />involves the construction of 1 recharge well, 1 augmentation well, various pipeline, and 23 recharge <br />ponds. The project will generate augmentation credits to cover the depletions for the 45 existing <br />wells. The project is currently under construction and is anticipated to be complete by September <br />of2005. <br /> <br />14 Tohn,on "nc1 Rc1w"rc1, Ditch C:omp"ny- AlIvnentetion Projed <br /> <br />Authorization: Construction Fund <br />Water Source: South Platte Basin _ <br />Terms of Loan: $132,500 @ 2.5% for 30-years <br /> <br />County: Morgan/Washington <br />__ Proj ect Yield: 8,900 acre-feet. _ . <br />Project Type: Well Augmentation <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. The Johnson and Edwards Ditch Company operate the Johnson and Edwards Ditch to <br />delivery irrigation water to a 3,000 acre service area. This project involves the construction of 1 <br />recharge well, pipeline installation, 2 recharge ponds, and the purchase of reservoir water. This <br />project will generate sufficient augmentation credits to cover the Company's depletions from the 12 <br />wells they are currently operating. The project is currently under construction and is anticipated to <br />be complete by September of2005. <br /> <br />1 ~ C:entr"l C:olor"no W"ter C:on'erv"n~y Di,trid - W"ter Rigl1t" Pllr~h"'e "nc1 Gr~vel Pit C:on,t <br /> <br />Authorization: Construction Fund <br />Water Source: South Platte <br />Terms of Loan: $20,000,000 @2.75% for 30-years <br /> <br />County: Adams, Weld, Morgan <br />Project Yield: 12,300 acre-feet <br />Project Type: Water Supply/Augmentation <br /> <br />The CCWCD, located in Adams, Weld, and Morgan Counties has a service area of 300 <br />square miles. The Subdistrict has 650 members with 966 junior wells and has operated an <br />augmentation plan for these member since 1973. On December 17, 2001, the Colorado Supreme <br />Court issued a judgment that changed the manner of operation for substitute supply plans in <br />Colorado. The ruling stated that the State Engineer did not have the legal authority to approve <br />substitute supply plans. The Court also stated that substitute supply plans, such as the one operated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.