Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-~...... <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />_. ~ , <br /> <br />Appendix to question No. 12 <br /> <br />--. <br /> <br />'j <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />DISPOSITION OF SILVER IODIDE USED AS A SEE~lNG AGtNT1/ <br />Ii. Leo Tel.lcr:Il. Dougla!'> R. [uTll(:ron. and fJoooltl ,\. Kl~1n <br /> <br />A ma~hemacica~ model {crT the movement of silver fro~ <br />silver iodide through 8'so11 column vas develo~ed <br />I and tested. It Indicates~ tho.t the silver concentra- <br />I tion in the soU solution at an)' given 'time 18 best <br />\i represented by a kinetic-type reaction, coupled with <br />'~' an insignificant equilibrium-type reaction. A high <br />adsorption rnte constant controls the initial <br />, I-reaction. but 10 to 30 percent of input ailver con- <br />:,L~ent'ratio.n 1s likely to move through the profile. <br /> <br />-I ' <br /> <br />~. and J. D. Ives (Eds.). 1976. Ecological impacts of ~nowpack augmen~ation in the San <br />Colorado. San JUSn Ecology Project. Final Report. Colorado State Univ. Publ.. Fort <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Periodic samplin~ of surface soil and vegetation in <br />subalpine meadow, spruee. and aspen communities was <br />carried ou~ along five transecta in the target area <br />in an attempt to determine the disposition of silver <br />iodide nucleattnR a ent used in the San Juan snow au ~ <br />mentation project. amp es 0 0 aRe. tter. an ! <br />soil were taken at several elevations along the tran-~ <br />sects. when possible during spring and fall, to allow' <br />monitorin~ of silver content and silver movement in <br />the target area. To gatn additional info~tion on <br />silver dynamics, laboratory studies of silver move- <br />ment-in soil columns, analyses ot silver disposition <br />and movement in the vicinit ot round-based enera- <br />tor aites, and analyses of available data on silver <br />in water and snow were completed. The available data <br />show no slgnitlcant lncreasea 1n .ilver content were <br />detected on the' target area, and in some cases, 81~Ve <br />levels in aam lea taken at the end of the monitorina <br />~ared to be lover than in aamplea taken at the be- <br />Rinning 0 thO program. ver ten s to reta ne <br />surface soil and litter. thou2h acme movement to <br />subsurfae.e sarr waa 0 aerved. -~irver content aT <br />streamflow did not indicate trends in silver content <br />which could be attributed to the seed1ng program. <br />, <br /> <br />LNTRDDUCTION <br /> <br />Theoretical consideratioDS of the behavior of silver <br />iodide.indicate a low 80lubility of the compound and <br />an extreme probability of rapid immobilization in the <br />soil system. These point to unlikely ecological im- <br />pact, but it was considered necessary to undertake s <br />monitoring program on the target area to determine <br />whethee additions of seeding material could be de- <br />tected. and wh~ther seeded material could be taken up <br />by the major plant communities on the target area. <br /> <br />Ob1ectives <br /> <br />* 1. To measure the level of silver in the terrestrial <br />ecosystems of the target area on a periodic basis, in <br />or~~r to determine whether increases of silver can be <br />detect~. I <br />~ 2. To evaluate silver disposition surrounding seeding' <br />generator sites. to determine possible movement of <br />silver through ph)'sical and biological processes. <br />~ 3. To study silver movement through soils in labora- <br />tory systems. to better understand what influences <br />seeding agent accumulation and movement. <br />~ 4. To analyze areal and temporal trends in sUver <br />concentration oi snow and streamflow in the target <br />area from available non-experimental data. <br />- Sec+,'o"S O...:-rreJ- <br />-co.~CL(jSIONS <br /> <br />,/ <br /> <br />Three vearls monitorinK of silver concentrations in <br />folia:e, litter. and soil of aspen, spruce, and grass <br />rnmmu_ir.1e!J in the San Juan tarRet area of the IPpe~ <br />Colorado River Pilot Pro act has shown no signi icant <br />chanRes in these concentrations over t e per 0 0 <br />sampling. An analysis of sample numbers required ~o <br />detect annual additions of 0.002 to 0.006 ppm dry <br />v~ight of silver from cloud aeeding to spruce litter, <br />indicates that detection of the lower annual addition <br /> <br />.!I .!!! Steinhoff. ". <br />Juan Mountains. <br />Collins. <br />~I Present add~e'a: <br /> <br />would,require about ZOO samples per year for 5 years <br />at the 95 percent confidence level for each compon- <br />ent. If the variance of silver concentration can be <br />reduced from 0.08 to 0.02 ppm the pr~aent sampling <br />program should be adequate to detect an annual addi- <br />tion of 0.002 ppm after 4 )'ears. At the Pagoss <br />Springs generator site No. 25 silver levels in <br />foliage, litter, soil, and grass in spring 1973. <br />were generally slightly lower than in spring 1972, <br />but still somewhat higher than before seeding com- <br />menced in fall 1970. Concentrations showed a general <br />decline from maximum levels at 10-20 m. to background <br />levels at about 200 m from the aite. <br /> <br />Mean values of silver concentrations on the target <br />area show that spruce litter (0,18 ppm, ash basis) <br />and foliage (0.17 ppm, ash basis) have significantly <br />higher silver concentrations than spruce 8011 (0.08 <br />ppm, ash basis). On a dry' weight basis. slIver con~ <br />centration in soil is s1KnificantlY Ereater than In <br />foliage in all three vegetation typ~. A <br />seasona~ trend ot s1~ver concentr.~ns-rn <br />both solI and va atation indicated hi her concentra~ <br />tion. n spr ns t an n a . tat tes 0 tot <br />silver in the- foreat ec08 .t~ ladlc.te that the top <br />cm 0 so conta n t e u 0 t e s vert a out <br />700 time. that in seeded anow aDd. 2000 time. that <br />present in the foliaae. Foliar waShing'indicated <br />sign1tlcant suruce aeposition~ StDal1" pilot tests <br />of soil leaching and plant uptake'processea indicated <br />strong root adsorption of silver and inhibition of <br />plant uptake. <br /> <br />, ~.'!;. . <br /> <br />Althou h silver concentration. in snow were found to <br />be too variable to 8 ow stat t . y. go cant <br />differences between sitea in the' target- area and <br />others to the weat and east OL 1~, tne mean-B1~vel <br />concentration in snow on the target area 1a about <br />twice as high as the downwind ..an. and three times <br />as high as the upwind mean. Total seeding intensity <br />(i.e., g Agl burned by aLl generators pe~-DOnth) <br />was not a good predictor of silver concentration in <br />snow at Wolf Creek Pass. No alEn1flcant differences <br />in silver concentration of streamflow could be found <br />between 5 streams including 3 on the target area and <br />2 to the \lest (up.,lnd) ot it. ,.Iean annua.L s1J.ver <br />concentration tor the t1ve streams increased from <br />(0.1 to,)) x 10-10 g 1m! in 1971~o (0,6 r 1.1) x <br />10-10 g 1m! in 1973. However, mean metric conversion <br />dlschar~e also increased from 2.9 m3/acc (103 cfa) In <br />1971 ~o 4..5 m3/sec (160 cfs) in 1973. Although a <br />relationship Qbviously exIsts between discharge and <br />silver concentration in indivIdual streams, no <br />general predictive model could be developed between <br />the tvo parameters. <br /> <br />Un!ted Nations Educational. Scientific. and Cultural Orr,anitation. Paris. france. <br /> <br />t05 <br /> <br />A-Bd-I <br />