My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00213
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:28:42 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:16:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Applicant
North American Weather Consultants
Sponsor Name
Upper Colorado River Commission
Project Name
The Potential Use of Winter Cloud Seeding Programs to Augment the Flow of the Colorado River
Title
The Potential Use of Winter Cloud Seeding Programs to Augment the Flow of the Colorado River
Prepared For
Upper Colorado River Commission
Prepared By
Don Griffith, NAWC
Date
3/1/2006
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />material. make it unlikely that other agents. \....ith the exception of dry ice, will be used on a large <br />scale. unless there are improvements in delivery systems and major changes in the economics of <br />silver availability:' In the same book a summ.u)' of potcntial impacts on humans is as follows: <br />"The effects on humans of ingestion or topical contact with silver iodide used in cloud seeding <br />can be considercd negligible. Decade-long observations of cases (unrelated to cloud seeding) of <br />ingestion of large silver doses revealed no physiological concern. In addition. surveys of secding <br />generator operators who have had long-term intensive contact with silver iodide reveal that they <br />have not expcrienced medical ditTicuhies." <br /> <br />A report prepared by Tom Ryan (Ryan. 2005) of the Metropolitan Water District of <br />Southern California contains the following summary on the topic of possible toxicity of silver <br />iodide: <br />There has been a concern about the toxicil)' of the mosl ('ommon cloud seeding <br />malerial. silver iodide (Agl) on Ihe environment. l11e IJ11ical concenlration (~fsilver in <br />rainwater or snowfrom a s!'eded cloud is less than 0, I micrograms perliteI'. The <br />Em:ironmental Protection Agency recOImnend\. that the concentration afsilver in <br />drinking water not exceed o. 10 milligrams per liter of water, Many regions have milch <br />higher concentrations ofsilrer in the soil than are fiJUnd in .\'eeded clouds. Indllstryemits <br />100 times as milch sil1'er into the atmosphere in many parts oj the country, and silver <br />from seeding isfar exceeded by indil-'idual exposure from tooth filling~. The <br />('ollcentratioll of ioc/ine in iodized sallllsed onfood is fill' ahove the ('ollcentrationfinmd <br />in rainwater from a seeded storm. /11'0 signijicllfll environmeflllll effects JIll\'e been noted <br />around o{X'rafional projects, mWl)' of which have been in operation/hI' 30 to./O years <br />IWAtA. 1996). <br /> <br />The conccntration of silver in rain water or sno\v from a seeded cloud using the above <br />information is on the order of 1000 times less than the EPA Standard. <br /> <br />Sccdin~ Susllcnsions <br /> <br />Almost all oftoday's cloud seeding program designs iuentify situations in which seeding <br />activitics should be suspendcd. Example:s of reasons for suspcnsions may include avalanche <br />warnings. l1ash 1100d warnings. and excess snowpack accumulation. The last type of suspensions <br />insures that cloud seeding docs not result in sno\....packs that excccd long-lcrm historical <br />maximum values. This factor was considcrcd in lhe consideration of potential environmental <br />impact studics such as that referenced in the Steinhoff study (1976). <br /> <br />.7.0 Potential Legal Issues <br /> <br />There are ccrtain licensing and pennit rcquiremcnts in each of the four states of Arizona. <br />Colorado. Utah and Wyoming related pertaining to the conduct of weather modificalion (cloud <br />secding) programs. Somc special consideration may need to be given to be needed for pOlenlial <br />target areas that straddle state lines (e.g. the Sierra MadreiPark Range eomplcx in northern <br />Colorado and southern Wyoming). In thcse cases would pennits be reqllircd from both states or <br />could ajoint permitting system be deHlopcd? Additional water gcnerated from cloud seeding <br />activities is typically trcated as natural water that is approprialed according to lhe existing waler <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.