Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br /> <br />1 will be subject to cross-examination by the Applicant. <br /> <br />2 Prior to proceeding, I would like to enter in <br /> <br />3 the record a telephone call just received on behalf of John <br /> <br />4 B. Shawcroft and Robert Teem of Alamosa in which they made <br /> <br />5 the point that, one, they would have preferred the hearing <br /> <br />8 to be in the San Luis Valley and, two, they strongly urge <br /> <br />1 the maintenance of the same advisory committee concept that <br /> <br />8 was used last year. <br /> <br />9 And I think that will be described in more detail <br /> <br />10 by the Applicant, is that right, Mr. Maynes? <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />MR. MAYNES: That's correct, Mr. Hearing Officer. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />HEARING OFFICER SJAASTAD: I also would like to <br /> <br />13 enter into the record a letter of opposition by Allen <br /> <br />14 Nossaman, Land Use Administrator for San Juan County. At <br /> <br />15 this time I'll give a copy of that to the Applicant for <br /> <br />16 future response. <br /> <br />11 (Committee's Exhibit A, subse- <br />quently marked for identifica- <br />18 tion , received in evidence.) <br /> <br />19 We're ready to proceed, then, Mr. Maynes. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />MR. M.l\YNES: Thank you very much, Mr. Hearing <br /> <br />21 Officer. I believe that, with the possible exception of Mr. <br /> <br />22 Woodard, the members of the Advisory committee are somewhat <br /> <br />23 familiar with the proceeding that we're having here today; <br /> <br />24 and may I say that if any members of the Advisory Committee <br /> <br />2S at any time wish to interrupt my direct questioning of the <br />