Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />II <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />IS <br /> <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br /> <br />2S <br /> <br />1 intended project Area, that it would be a normal assumption <br /> <br />2 that these would not be continued in the design of the pro- <br /> <br />3 gram, but would be excluded as far as seeding during those <br /> <br />, situations. <br /> <br />S MRS. HASTINGS: How far would the downwind effect <br /> <br />carry in your program? <br /> <br />MR. HJERMSTAD: All I can do is relate what has <br /> <br />been learned initially from the Pilot Project, and those <br /> <br />storm conditions that contributed to the downwind effect by, <br /> <br />as much as humanly possible, eliminating those from the <br /> <br />design. <br /> <br />I have no idea what a slight residual effect <br /> <br />might be; but again, if you look at the real water, that was <br /> <br />the culprit, if you want to think of it that way, in terms of <br /> <br />this downwind effect. <br /> <br />The small amount, if I can even eliminate that or <br /> <br />put that almost near zero as an unintended effect, this would <br /> <br />be the int~nt of the design of the program~ <br />MRS. HASTINGS: You didn't answer my question. <br /> <br />MR. HJERMSTAD: The best I can say is that I <br /> <br />honestly don't know. If you assumed that by eliminating it <br /> <br />you would at least erase that portion that did contribute it, <br /> <br />I would have to say then that I am hoping that the result, <br /> <br />the downwind effect of this program, would be. zero. <br /> <br />MR. TAYLOR: One question: Has there been any <br /> <br />~~ <br />