My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00151
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:28:12 PM
Creation date
10/1/2006 2:14:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Rules and Regulations
Title
Modification of Weather
Date
5/23/1973
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />36 <br /> <br />1 which you are concerned with, and relating to my experience as <br /> <br />2 a Hebring Office~, and trying to make findings or fact, there <br /> <br />3 are various definitioDs in the Ac{, that elude me sometimes. <br /> <br />4 One or them is a primary target a~ea, and the other is the <br /> <br />5 area which might De affected by the weather modification opex'a <br /> <br />6 tion. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />11m not always certain, in reviewing the Act, that <br /> <br />8 these are different, or have diff~rent meanings) or they're on <br /> <br />9 and the same. I rather think they're s\.lPposed to be two <br /> <br />10 separate things. The primary target area being the area withi, <br /> <br />11 a limited geographical area, which might be brought under the <br /> <br />12 operations itself, but the ereas that might be affected could <br /> <br />13 reach several counties away, and it seems to me that in giVing <br /> <br />14 notice, that it shollld be interpreted, the Act, that the givin <br /> <br />15 of notice\\Tould go to all of the counties, not just the primary <br /> <br />16 target areasl counties, where activity might be- felt, or the <br /> <br />17 effect of the operation might be felt. <br /> <br />18 I WOuld reiterate again that the propos6d )~ules under <br /> <br />19 Article II (D) make DO reference to time within which the <br /> <br />20 notice is to be given, and certainly I think that's a material <br /> <br />21 issue. <br /> <br />22 I would propose to the Advisory Committee that where <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />the stat'qte itself is not <br /> <br />. "' <br />spec:... :ClC, <br /> <br />or is not clear as to <br /> <br />24 certa:i.ll aspects of the graDting of permits, 0;: liCEnses, that <br /> <br />25 it should be the fuDctioD of the rules to illeke them mo~e <br /> <br />MRS, LaRINA M, BROWN <br />CERTIFIEO SHORTHAND REPORTER <br />2.83 TITAN ST'REET <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.