Laserfiche WebLink
<br />35 <br /> <br />1 comments of mine: One is that pa::agraph letter: (D) at this <br /> <br />2 time does not indicate any time ,,,:tthin whi.ch any time the <br /> <br />3 notice must be given. <br /> <br />4 Now, the I-ieather l'lodification Acts says at this time <br /> <br />5 that the notice must be published in the newspapers, ,.hieh has <br /> <br />6 been taken to mean a newspaper of general ci.:rct,lation, actuall, <br /> <br />7 printed and published in the county for a period of seven days <br /> <br />8 prior, or within seven days prior to the hearing. <br /> <br />9 This is not always a fcC'.sible time period, bec811se, <br /> <br />10 as you all know, many of our nem3papers in the rural c01.:'nties <br /> <br />11 are Pl,blished on Thl1rsdays, a11d if you ",ere having a hearing <br /> <br />12 on Thl.,rsday, or some other day, it's a little difficl.11t to <br /> <br />13 coordinate the printing of that notice. <br /> <br />14 I would propose that 'i:b2 1:'t,1e regarding the giving <br /> <br />15 of notice be more stringent thaDi:he statvte itself. ~~he <br /> <br />16 statute providing the public of publication within seven days; <br /> <br />17 that the actual publication required by the rules be at least <br /> <br />18 two times prior to the hearing, and that can be over a period <br /> <br />19 of more than seven days, and it could be 'Vlithin, commencing <br /> <br />20 four days prior to the hearing, so that if you got two publica <br /> <br />21 tions in that peri.od of time, yOl) increase the cer-tainty that <br /> <br />22 the general public has been advised or the hearingo <br /> <br />23 I chink that Mr. Beatty's comrnents, contained in <br /> <br />24 his letter, to which I earlier referred (Exhibit C), contains <br /> <br />25 a valid remark as regards the definition of the areas "lith <br /> <br />MRS, LORINA M, BROWN <br />CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTE~ <br />283 TITAN STREET <br />AURORA, COLORADO 600\0 <br />