Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"..."',-. <br /> <br />.,~.".'; ~'. <br /> <br />"'io!'.1d;."~~'i'; <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />.-...~ <br /> <br />Rt!CEIVID <br /> <br />MAV ;:. :; '90 <br /> <br />, COLORAQo WAT!A <br />CONerftVAT/ON <br />GENERAL INTEREST, Kansas crop insurance rates and rules for w't~ have <br />not changed since 1988. That's the bad news. Although each year the <br />Overwhelmin8' majority of crop daroa15" insurance cl/>iros are for hail <br />damage to wheat, our inforlwtion of hail da~8e c1a1100 for all crops <br />the past two years indicate that total number of hail damage claims <br />dropped below the averaseof 139 claims established frum 1975 through <br />1987 for counties participating in the weather IQodlfication program. <br />1988 and 1989 claims averaged 112 per county. or appro:xilDll.tely 19% <br />less than the previously established 13-year average. Although our <br />information does not include ,total dollar e>mount of' damage done, there <br />ia little doubt that an aver~ge of 27 leas hail instances per county <br />per year for eaoh partJ.cipating county translates 111to mOl-e money :tor <br />the regional eoonomy the past two years. Caution shOUld be used when <br />using averages like thts because not all counties received "ave~-a8e <br />daroagtil" over the two year per1od---some reported more than average <br />claims, others 1es8. Also, there arppears to b", d1.fferences among <br />counties with respect to crop and amount insured. <br /> <br />-) <br /> <br />NEWSLBTTER 90 - 3 <br /> <br />FOR THE WEEK <br /> <br />KAY 12 - MAY 15, <br /> <br />1990 <br /> <br />The ourrent lon8'-term <15 year) average number- of hail claims per <br />target area county has deolined a further 2.11. from the 13-year <br />average establi!"ll1ed in 1987. Hopefully, wileu new I.'ates are set, the <br />decrease will translate into lower insurance cost8 ill many parte; of <br />western and southwestern Kansas. <br /> <br />OPERATIONAL: <br /> <br />MAY 15th---OPERATIONAL DAY #3: An 1solated mid-afternoon storm moved <br />into Kansas from Colorado, just west of Sharon Springs. Initi~lly, <br />the storm was not 'very severe anoi its prior- movement 1ndicataed it <br />should p~S8 north of the target area as it moved e~st-southeast. One <br />aircraft was launched to the storm. WIlen seeding for hail began on <br />the storm near Sharon Springs at 4:12 p.m., MDT, a second plane WaS <br />scrambled. As the rapidly movin8 storm mDved further into Kansas, the <br />main precipitation center initially t~'acked just north of the 1l0rth'21-n <br />tier of target area counties. The second aircraft began seeding at <br />4140 p. m. west of Russell Springs. Around 5 p. In., strong storm <br />intensification occurred with subsequent new growth building on its <br />south side, well into the target ",'ea.. Both remaining planes had been <br />scrambled minutes earlier. <br /> <br />The storm cent~r first entered target area country around 5:30 <br />p.m., MDT, in the extreme NE part of Wichita and NW Scott count1es, <br />then passed over Scott Lake and went further into NW Lane County. The <br />other two planes beg'an seeding at 5:35 p.m. "11,15:41 p.m.. bbout the <br />time the storm passed over Scott La.ke; all :foul- aircraft cont11luecl <br />s~eding as it went into and across Lane County, Horth of Dighton, <br />before its dissipation: <br /> <br />Hail up to galiball size was reported to have damaged crops, <br />buildings and vehicles 1n Scott County along tlle stonn track. <br />