Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_Lower Soil Te~erature <br /> <br />A noticeable decline in forest populations of small <br />mammals occurred followinR winters of heavy snol../lal1. <br />This was most evident In the numbers of deer mice <br />(Perornyscus maniculatus) but it was also found in <br />chipmunks (Eutamlas min!mus) and in Xicrotus spp. <br />The basic reason for the population decline derives <br />from the delayed growth of ess@nrial ~orin~ foorl~ ~nrl <br />results primarilY from a delay In breeding so that <br />~fewer littar9 are produced. The delayed growth of <br />plants was a function of lower soil temperatures and <br />the longer snow cover. No similar effect was found <br />on the toad (Bufo boreas), or pocket gopher (Thomonvs <br />talpoides) populat~ <br /> <br />.-Deeper Snowpack <br /> <br />As snov depth increaged~ elk (Cervus candensisl ~ <br />to areas where snow was shallower than 40 cm. They <br />avoided re ions with mare than 70 ~m at penetrasre- <br />snow depth. A 15 percent increase n snowpac may <br />decrease available elk winter range by 8 percent. <br />Sprin~ mo~ement of elk ~as more stron~ly associated <br />with the-start of n~w KrOwth in mountain meadows than <br />directly with the recedinR snowline. Ample habitat <br />was available for elk calvinK belov th~ snowline and <br />without re~ard to snow depth. <br /> <br />Microbes <br /> <br />Plant litter in the tundra dec~eased in a~eas oE <br />deeper snowpack. Jh1s oresumably reflects removal by <br />the additional' flux of water through the syste~ rather <br />than an increase in decomposition rates. <br /> <br />Abiotic Factors <br /> <br />The effects of the snovpack on soil erosion resulted <br />from the greater area of bare soil left by the decrease <br />_.in vegetative cover around snowbanks. Those predicted <br />Lor the tundra area ot the San Juan Mountains derive <br />fro~ etcher the additional snow dePth or the additional <br />meltwater produced by cloud seeding. <br /> <br />-Deep.er SnoWP.,ack <br /> <br />If [he area of lon2-1astina snowbanks expand after an <br />increase 1n snowfall. local chanRes in the rates of <br />soil erosion on the bare surface around them may in- <br />crease by a factor of 10. This effect should not <br />extend beyond the immediate v1cinit of alread ex- <br />at ng snoW r ta an ao a uld not be important re~ <br />~ional1 Y. <br /> <br />'. -Additional Melt'Water <br /> <br />Theoretical con9ideratlons SU&KeSt that an increased <br />streamflow generated by cloud seeding should be <br />associated with an increase in the total amount of <br />dissolved caterial removed from the target area. This <br />is supported by emp~rical observations of rock weather- <br />ing rates and stream water quality in the tundra <br />environmeat. However~ this effect will ~e 51i~ht Dnd <br />should not be concentrated spatially. <br /> <br />-Historical Climatolo&y <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Temperature flUCtuations over the last 120 y~ars in- <br />dicate a cooling trend from the late 1860's to abOut <br />1930 ~hen a reversal occ~rred; precipitatiun trends <br />are inversely rel::tted to temperature l:=-;:;nds. Thes>:, <br />trends are qul.::~ -:Hffe.rent fr0r.\ '::1"3en-Jt~d in .'1:1;'".:: <br />,pa!'t"3- ;J.f the- ~o!"th,::,:-n' Hecisph~!'~.. - '''i:!:HonaL ?','.:~::::._b'~::,,- <br /> <br />tion fluctuations sho~ rapid transitions from r~lative- <br />ly dry to relatively wet ~odes. <br /> <br />-Silver <br /> <br />No significant increase in silver concentration were <br />found in the target area. except in small areas near <br />generator sites. atter four winters of seedin~. ~ <br />deleterious effects of silver iodide additions have <br />been noted at concentrations which could be expected <br />due to cloud seeding. <br /> <br />HISTORY AND DESIGN <br /> <br />The San Juan Ecology Project was established as one of <br />a complex of investigations arising from the need to <br />explore. the possibilities of increasing the availabil- <br />it9 of water in the United States Southwest. In 1968- <br />Congress authorized the Bur~au of Recla@8tion to <br />initiate weather modification pilot projects to test <br />the feasibility of large scale winter cloud seeding <br />which showed promise of being an economical technique <br />for augmenting the flow of the Colorado River (Division <br />of Atmospheric Water Resources Management 1970). <br />Analysis of previOUS resea~ch findinRs indicated that <br />the most likely chance of success would corne from <br />_' winter seeding of orographic storms over 90t:le of the <br />high mountain areas situated in the Upper Colorado <br />. River Basin. Grant et al. (l96a) tested this approach <br />00 a limited scale at Climax. Colorado. and found <br />si~nificaot increases in snowfall when seeding eX?er- <br />!iments ~ere perforoed under specific ~eather situations. <br />'Knowled e accruin from this study. and from t~ others <br />in Colorado Steamboat Springs and Wel Creek Pass. <br />and from a National Academy of Sciences Report (1964), <br />led to the conclusion that caretully canaged w1nter <br />cloud-seeding techniques could produce a ~U to jU <br />percent increase in mountain sno~tall. Tne Bureau of <br />Reclamation designed the Colorado R1ver Basin PilOt <br />Project (part of Project Skywater) to test this <br />possibility on a sub-operational scale. The most re- <br />cent statement on the effectiveness of this design is <br />given in summary form by Howel~ (this _Cha,?ter). <br /> <br />The San Juan Mountains of so~thwestern COlorado ~ere <br />chosen as the site of the cloud seeding pilOt project <br />because of their strategic location for inte~cepting <br />winter orographic storms deriving from the south~est <br />which would also ensure relatively frequent occurrence <br />of a cloud-top tecperature condition calculated ~o be <br />within the I:1Ost effective seeding range of above -26 C. <br />The original area destined 20 receive 2he cloud-seed- <br />ing experiment was 8,550 km (3,300 c1 ) on the west- <br />ern side of the Continental Divide, and above 2.900 m <br />(9,500 ft) elevation (Fig. 1)~ <br /> <br />-< <br /> <br />.\ ~~i~i <br />~.)~ <br />..-. ~~ <br />... H.'''' soUl \ <br />.:;..... 1- 11_." ~_ <br />t-.........l... <br />'OIOUTIITU <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />r~~un'~ r. San Juan cl';~d -s-:'!'eding targo!t area, and <br />iO~~~3ive stud: sito!s. <br /> <br />-27- <br /> <br />A-13-3 <br />