Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 . <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />29. <br /> <br />___ Q When you say critical, are you referring to the <br /> <br />possibilty of over-precipitation? ----- <br />A Yes, sir. Right. Now, again, when we're talking <br /> <br />about increases of ranges ten to fifteen percent, those <br /> <br />increases in themselves aren't significant, but any time <br /> <br /> <br />that there is going to be sufficient precipitation, <br /> <br /> <br />that it might cause, might result in a hazard; road condition <br /> <br /> <br />or anything like this, we feel that there it would be <br />better -ho.t:to.operate, so we would terminate. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. MORAN: Well, excuse me, Mr. Stone. What you're <br /> <br /> <br />indicating to the Advisory Committee is that if the <br /> <br /> <br />operation is conducted under the supervision and control <br /> <br /> <br />set forth in the plan, then in itself, it doesn't involve <br /> <br /> <br />a high degree of risk, but that if these risk factors <br /> <br /> <br />were to~e expanded because of a change in the climatelogical <br /> <br /> <br />conditions, you would have to curtail your operation? <br /> <br /> <br />THE WITNESS: We actually don't feel that it iilvolves <br /> <br /> <br />a high degree of risk, regardless. But the only thing <br /> <br /> <br />we feel that if you're going to have a situation that might <br /> <br /> <br />naturally, say there wasoomeseeding going on at all <br /> <br /> <br />that could result in hazardous conditions, we feel it would <br /> <br /> <br />be better to terminate rather than to continue to operate <br />under those conditions. <br /> <br />MR. MORAN: Now, does the contract you refer to reserve <br /> <br />to the company ~he right to terminate under the conditions <br /> <br />SUZANNE M. CLAAR <br />