Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ANALYSIS: Most important about the results was that it reveals <br />rural landowners have a widespread acceptance of our program. In <br />the 2 counties never ,before participating in it, Morton and Meade, <br />landowners are in favor by 3. 2-to-l and 2, 6-to-l, respectively. <br />Standing out most overwhelmingly in favor are the landowners in <br />Seward County...at 7-to-l! Of the total number either in favor or <br />against, the percentage in favor ranges from 71% to 87.5%. <br /> <br />The numbers of cards returned varied from county to county, <br />ranging from 26% to 38% of the total numbers sent out. We've been <br />told by others sampling the numbers of cards received was in the <br />range of what would normally be expected to be returned and not an <br />unusually low response. <br /> <br />A degree ,of regional response can be rile a's uredby combining all <br />counties' votes "In Favor" and "Not In Favor". The total "In Favor" <br />is 663, whereas, the "Not In Favor" totals 213, From this we find: <br />Of those having opinions of being "In Favor" or "Not In Favor" of <br />joining the weather modification program, the reaional response is <br />that 75.7 % of the rural landowners are in favor of ioining. <br /> <br />We strongly encourage the county commissioners of the four <br />counties surveyed to take into advisement the strong desires of <br />their rural constituency and bring their counties into the weather <br />modification program next year, What is needed is for funding to be <br />~llocated for it in the 1997 budget proceedings now in progress. <br />It's important to remember our program is one ~hich attempts to <br />improve the economic livelihood of the regional agricultural base. <br />The long-term statistics indicate that on a long-term basis we are <br />accomplishing our objectives. <br /> <br />On a separate not~: The bad news finally broke: This past week <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board officially denied our request <br />to be permitted to seed clouds in Colorado. Although we're still <br />able to fly into Colorado, we aren't allowed to seed clouds there. <br />we've already been flying into Colorado to me,et some advancing <br />, &torme,to help us' determine impor,ta.nt characte!'istics "',pout them <br />before they arrive at the state line. It'S likely that even doing <br />only that probably drives some of them wackier than they already <br />are. Our permit denial will be discussed more in another newsletter <br />as well as the CBS story; maybe next week. <br /> <br />OPERATIONS: This week ended our torrid pace of seeding operations <br />since the Memorial Day weekend in late May. High pressure moved in <br />over the' region bringing us much warmer temperatures and fewer <br />thunderstorms. The few storms which did develop in late afternoons <br />formed on the edge of the target area, or outside it, and were <br />nearly stationary. Seeding was performed on two days in the early <br />part and one at the end of the period. All times are COT. <br /> <br />JUNE 29th - OPERATIONAL DAY #35: The trailing end of a cold front <br />lay along a line from North-Central Kansas southwest to Liberal and <br />extended further across and the Oklahoma Panhandle into the Texas <br />Panhandle. By 4 p.m. severe storms began forming along the frontal <br />