WSPP00114 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ?Qt\'5 GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Federal Control and Jurisdiction. Tho Taylor Bill has beon carefully drawn. It includes every word, paragraph and~ruvision nocessary to confer upon a federal. Corporation complote control and jurisdiction over the ~mter rosouroos of tho Columbia Basin rogion; Suoh eontrol extends to present and potontial develop- mont of those vital res ouI'ces. This is acc omplished by the legal offect which must bo givon to gonoral provisions of the Bill. Cortain spocific languago, deal- ing with State rights in water, when analyzod in connoction with those general provisions, is nothing more than an idlo gesture. Such language may doludo the cursory,reader or those who hnve not fully considorod tho effect of the all-porvad40"G ing jurisdictional clauses in the Bill. In this conncctien particular attention should be called to threo prov~s~ono, namely, the declaration of Congrossional policy in Soction 2, tho repealor clauso in Section 27, and tho construction clause in Section 29. Along ,vith those p~ovisions consideration must bo given to the extensivo authority givon to the Corporation for tho oxorciso of tho powor of ominont domain (condomnation of proporty) in the Fedoral courts. Tho Bill very fully covers this broad po,vcr under every conceivable condition whoro tho Corporation may find it dosirablo to go into tho Fodoral courts and acquiro by condomnation, privato and, in rrany instances, public proporty. May we briefly consider those clausos and their offect in effectuating completo control of the water rosourcos of tho Columbia Ehsin region by tho Autherity. (a) In Section 2 of the Bill the Congross doclares that it croates tho Authority to accomplish the development program thorcin montioned, "******0.11 for tho purpose of fostering and protecting commerce among tho several states, strengthening the nntio~~l dofonso, *** and promoting the goneral welfare of the United Statea******11 These aro all broad powors of tho Foderal government set forth in the constitution. They aro dologated to tho Fodoral govornment and transcond thoso roservod to tho Statos; and if theso povrors can be constitutio~~lly invoked by the Congress in oroating an Authority, this statoment of policy makes ineffoctual any words containod in tho bill ostensibly designed to rocognize State water rights. Further, we should never lose sight of tho conclusions roached by Seno.te Committoe, when reporting on tho M.V.A. Bill, that thoso powors aro nocessary for tho Authority to accomplish the purposos for which it is created, but that such pur- poses cannot be attained and at the same time prosorvo the integrity of State wa tor laws. (b) The Ropoaler Provision (Section 27) reads: "Soc. 27. All Acts or parts ef Acts in conflict herewith aro horoby ropealed, so far as thoy affoct tho operations contemplated by this Act. Effoctive as of the date tho transfers authorized by sootion 9 (a) of this Aot bocomo effoctive, the Act of August 20, 1937, entitlod 'An Act to authorize tho complotion, rrnintennnce, and operation ..5-