Laserfiche WebLink
<br />THE RISE OF ENVIRONMENTALISM <br /> <br />During the 1960s <br />and 197o.'i public <br />attention shifted 10 <br />em'imnmental changes <br />filar had occurred in <br />California and els('\\'here, <br />sllch as pol/u/ion. <br /> <br />Unquestionably, the water projects reduced the <br />frequency of flooding, improved the quantity and <br />quality of water supplies and augmented electric <br />power supplies, But during the 1960s and 1970s <br />public attention shifted to environmental changes that <br />had occurred in California and elsewhere, such as <br />declining wildlife, pollution, urbanization and alter- <br />ations of natural stream flows. <br /> <br />Congress responded to these concerns by enacting <br />legislation such as the ESA that gave critics of the <br />water projects some legal ammunition to challenge <br />practices they ciaimed adversely affected wiidlife, For <br /> <br /> <br />instance, the 1989 designation of Sacramento River <br />winter-run chinook salmon as a threatened species <br />torced both the CVP and SWP to make operational <br />changes in efforts to preserve the winter-fun, whose <br />numbers had dropped sharply in the previous two <br />decades. <br /> <br />Perhaps the strongest expression of public concern <br />about the environmental effects of water develop- <br />ment came in 1982 when California voters over. <br />whelmingly rejected a proposal to construct the <br />42-mile Peripheral Canal to carry Sacramento River <br />water more efficiently around the Delta to CVP and <br />SWP pumping plants near Tracy, Critics said the <br />canal would increase water exports to southern <br />California, to the detriment of Delta fish and wildlife, <br />Proponents called the canal the last link in the SWP <br />system that would improve conditions in the Delta <br />by helping to avoid "reverse flow" conditions during <br />periods of low Deita inflow and high exports, when <br />powerful south Delta pumps actually reverse the <br />natural westward flow of fresh water, drawing water <br />east and south through the estuary, <br /> <br />Developments in the 1990s showed just how far <br />environmental restoration had come. Although stake- <br />holders were sharply divided on it, the 1992 CVPIA <br />included an annual $50 million environmental resto- <br />ration fund and dedicated 800,000 acre-feet of <br />annual CVP yield (600,000 acre-feet in dry years) <br />for environmental purposes, inciuding rebuilding <br />depleted valley fisheries, By 1994, however, many <br />of those same stakeholders had joined in the Bay- <br />Delta Accord (which became known as CALFED) to <br />participate in a collaborative effort to find long-term <br />solutions to California's vexing water problems. <br />CALFED for the first time put environmental resto- <br />ration on par with water-supply issues in the search <br />for long-term answers to California's water problems. <br /> <br />The courts also have played a role in environmental <br />restoration by enforcing state and federal laws <br />intended to protect water bodies and species. <br />Perhaps the most celebrated and important judicial <br />intervention occurred in Mono Lake, when the <br />California Supreme Court appiied the Public Trust <br />doctrine to the non-navigable tributary creeks of <br />Mono Lake, That 1983 decision resulted in a long- <br />term plan to restore the Mono Lake region, and <br />perhaps more importantly, set a legal precedent that <br />could be applied to seek environmenfal restorafion <br />elsewhere. <br />