<br />Dredging altered the natural contours of rivers and
<br />disturbed the gravel beds used by salmon tor spawn-
<br />ing. Hydraulic and placer mining washed debris and
<br />sediments into rivers and streams that eventually
<br />clogged them and prevented some from discharg-
<br />ing into larger rivers.
<br />
<br />The population explosion that accompanied the Gold
<br />Rush also affected the terrestrial environment.
<br />Riparian forests were quickly cut down by new
<br />immigrants for fuel and construction materials. Native
<br />species of birds and mammals were hunted for food,
<br />clothing or export, disrupting the complex
<br />ecosystems that had evolved over previous millen-
<br />nia. Nonnative species were introduced, deliberately
<br />and accidentally, which disrupted the delicate
<br />balances of native ecosystems and sometimes led
<br />to extinction of California species.
<br />
<br />Early California settlers quickly recognized the
<br />potential of the Delta and the then-marshy Central
<br />Valley for farming. Land reclamation began in the
<br />Delta as early as the 1860s with the construction ot
<br />
<br />SUPPLYING WATER
<br />
<br />As California's population mushroomed after the
<br />Gold Rush, so did its water needs, Coastal areas
<br />such as San Francisco and Los Angeles were
<br />becoming urbanized. Between 1913 and 1923, Los
<br />Angeles, San Francisco and a group of East Bay
<br />cities built or planned reservoirs in the Sierra Nevada
<br />to deliver water by aqueduct to coastal urban areas.
<br />Conservationists such as John Muir objected to the
<br />projects, but their pleas to save the Sierra water
<br />sources tapped by the coastal cities were ignored.
<br />
<br />Meanwhile, support was growing for a statewide
<br />water plan that would address the needs at agricul-
<br />tural and urban water users as well as provide flood
<br />protection and of her benefits, In 1 933 California
<br />voters approved the Central Valley Project (CVP),
<br />but Depression-era financing problems caused the
<br />project to be turned over to the federal government
<br />in 1937. The start of CVP construction in the late
<br />1930s marked the beginning of a massive
<br />replumbing of the state's water system that would
<br />transform the Delta and the river systems that
<br />supplied it.
<br />
<br />
<br />In 1951 the state Legislature authorized construc-
<br />tion of the Feather River Project, which later became
<br />known as the State Water Project, or SWP, Water
<br />that originates in the SWP's Oroville Reservoir is
<br />channeled through the Delta to the North Bay
<br />
<br />crude levees to drain wetlands, By 1930, about
<br />313,000 acres of former tidal and nontidal wetlands
<br />in the Delta had been placed behind constructed
<br />levees, Today, more than 1,000 miles of levees guard
<br />some 57 man-made Delta islands, some of which
<br />have land surfaces that lie 20 feet below the
<br />surrounding water level because of subsidence,
<br />making them ditficult or Impossible to restore,
<br />
<br />Throughout the Central Valley watershed, farmers
<br />built hundreds of small dams and miles of levees on
<br />streams and rivers to divert water to irrigate their
<br />crops during the dry summer season and protect
<br />their land from flooding. The thirst for water to supply
<br />agricultural needs and the growing cities led to
<br />construction of even larger water-storage and
<br />delivery facilities. Today, about 7 million acres of land
<br />in the Central Valley are under cultivation, using
<br />about 26 million acre-feet of water per year for
<br />irrigation (an acre-foot of water, about 326,000
<br />gallons, will cover a football field 1 foot deep, and
<br />meet the average annual indoor and outdoor needs
<br />of one to two urban households).
<br />
<br />Aqueduct and the California Aqueduct, which supply
<br />drinking water for parts of the Bay Area and southern
<br />California, and irrigation water for San Joaquin Valley
<br />agriculture. The federal CVP delivers about 7 million
<br />acre-feet of water per year, the SWP about 3
<br />million acre-feet.
<br />
<br />The CVP and SWP provided enormous benefits to
<br />agriculture, helping to make California the leading
<br />farming state in the U,S, with about $20 billion in
<br />annual crop production by the end of the 20th century,
<br />The projects contributed to the post-World War II
<br />economic and population booms that made Califor-
<br />nia the nation's most populous state by the mid-
<br />1 960s. They also helped stanch flooding that
<br />had periodically plagued urban areas such as
<br />Sacramento, and contributed much needed electric-
<br />ity to the state's power grid,
<br />
<br />But if harnessing the rivers brought agricultural
<br />bounty and protected California's growing popula-
<br />tion against floods, it also changed California's land-
<br />scape, particularly the Central Valley, by drying up
<br />wetlands, removing riparian areas, and altering
<br />habitat for birds, fish and mammals. By one estimate,
<br />less than 10 percent of historic riparian habitat in
<br />the Central Valley remains today, and about 80
<br />percent of hisforic salmon spawning habifaf has been
<br />blocked by dams,
<br />
<br />s
<br />
|