PUB00134

• Year: 1998
• Title: Construction Fund Annual Report 1998
• CWCB Section: Finance
• Author: CWCB
• Description: Construction Fund Annual Report 1998
• Publications - Doc Type: CF Annual Report

5.2

Satellite Monitoring System Maintenance Continuation

The Board recommended up to $120,000 be appropriated to the State Engineer to continue
systematic renovation of stream gaging stations and replace "data collection platforms" in the
statewide satellite monitoring system. . This system gathers streamflow data from selected gaging
stations and makes it available to water supply managers and other interested parties. This request
is for the fifth year of a ten year replacement program.

5.3

Arkansas River .Well Measurement Program Continuation

I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I

As a result of the litigation with Kansas in the Arkansas River basin, a controversy has arisen
between the states concerning the proper technique to measure well pumping. Kansas' position is
that only "totalizing flow meters" are appropriate. Colorado's position is that the "power
consumption coefficient (pCC) method" is appropriate in certain situations and should be used since
it is more efficient and less costly. The State Engineer, the Division Engineer and most well owners
prefer the PCC method. In order to provide information to the Special Master in Kansas v. Colorado
on which to base this recommendation, Colorado offered to have the USGS evaluate both methods
in the Arkansas River basin ~d repo~ o~ ~ suitability of ~f: J'<;:CI?e!.h~<L for ~f:.tf:.!:ffiining_ __I
pumping taking into consideration how the pumping is assigned to user groups within the
Hydrologic-Institutional Model. The study is being done through the USGS Cooperative Program,
and is expected to take at least two years to complete. $50,000 was appropriated last year which
included $25,000 for our share of the first year study costs and $25,000 to purchase and install
meters on randomly selected wells. The CWCB recommended an additional $75,000 be
appropriated this year to co~plete*~ .srudy,

5.4

Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Feasibility Study Increase

In 1997, the Board was authorized to expend up to $300,000 from the Construction Fund to
participate with the Army Corp~ ofEnginee~s and other water user entities in a reconnaissance study
to be conducted in 1997 for tile potential reallocation of flood control storage space to municipal
, '. .
water supply storage in Chatfield ReServoir. Since then, the Corps has streamlined its requirements,
and the reconnaissance study is no longer. necessary. The feasibility investigation will require about
$500,000 from the state. This section of the bill changes the amount from $300,000 to $500,000 and
eliminates language that referred to a reconnaissance study and other contingencies which are no
longer appropriate.

The investigation will examine the feasibility of reallocating storage in the flood control pool of
Chatfield reservoir to the conservation pool for water supply purposes, either permanently or on a
seasonal basis. Existing and alternative operations of the Chatfield, Cherry Creek and Bear Creek
reservoirs will be analyzed. Potential changes to downstream flows and to reservoir pool elevations
as well as the potential consequences to. water supplies, flood damages, recreation opportunities,
water quality, fish and wildlife.habitat, and other resources will be evaluated. Expenditure of the
funds will still be contingent upon the board negotiating a formal cost share agreement for the

CWCB FY98 Annual Report, page 36

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1