My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00109
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 8:58:17 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1995
Title
Califormia Water
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
Arthur L. Littlewort
Description
History, overview, and explanation of water rights and legislation of California
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />considered "higher" than others. Water Code ~ 106. The priority <br />clearly applies if applications are competing for the same water, but <br />no case law controis its application during water shortages. However, <br />in Lake Don Pedro CSD v. Merced Irr. Dist. (Mariposa County Sup. Ct. <br />(1992) No. 7066), the court entered a temporary restraining order <br />requiring the reduction of reservoir releases for agricultural uses in <br />order to guarantee a municipal supply. <br />As between statutory appropriators (between 1872 and 1913) <br />and later Water Code appropriators, the first to post and record <br />the notice or to file the application for a permit prevails. Civ. Code <br />~~ 1418-1419 (1872); Water Code ~ 1450. <br />As between statutory and nonstatutory appropriators from 1872 <br />to 1914, the former had priority if the notice was posted and recorded <br />before the nonstatutory appropriator actually diverted the water and <br />put it to a beneficial use.9 However, the nonstatutory appropriator <br />had priority to the extent of water diverted and put to beneficial use <br />before the statutory appropriator had posted and recorded the notice <br />as required by code. Haight v. Costanich (1920) 184 Cal. 426. <br />Senior appropriators cannot extend their use or make substantial <br />changes so as to interfere with the rights of junior appropriators. <br />Senior v. Anderson (1900) 130 CaI. 290, 297. As between upper and <br />lower appropriators, the first in time rule applies regardless of <br />location on the watercourse. Hill v. King (1857) 8 Cal. 336, 337 -338. <br /> <br />Limitations on Appropriative Rights <br />DivelSion/due diligence. To establish an appropriative right, the <br />appropriation must be completed within the time required by the <br />State Board permit, with due diligence applied to the construction of <br />diversion works. Water Code ~~ 1395-1398. Appropriative water <br />rights attach only to water actually used. No appropriative rights <br />attach before the completion of the appropriation, hut often "in- <br />choate" (or pending) rights do attach if there is due diligence in the <br />construction of diversion works. Water Code ~~ 1460, 1462-1464. <br />For appropriative rights acquired after 1914, the Water Code <br />provides that actual construction work upon the project must begin <br />within the time specified in the permit to appropriate water, not less <br />than sixty days from the date of the permit. Construction of the <br />diversion works and utilization of the water for beneficial purposes <br />must be done with due diligence in accordance with the statute, the <br />terms of the permit, and the rules and regulations of the State <br />Board. Water Code ~~ 1395-1398. Diligence is primarily a question <br /> <br />9 Rogers and '1ichols, ~ 209, pages 301. <br /> <br />Appropriatioe rights require due diligence <br />in the construction of necessary facilities <br />and the use of the water. <br /> <br />Chapter 2 Water Rights in California 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.