PUB00109 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

An appropriative right does not require land ownership or use of the water within the watershed. tVater may not be appropriated for instream purposes. 44 CALlPORNIA WATER . Water flowing in a natural channel (Water Code ~ 1201) . Underground waters constituting a subterranean stream fiowing through known, definite channels (Water Code ~ 1200) . Spring waters (Ely v. Ferguson (1891) 91 Cai. 187; De Wolfskill v. Smith (1907) 5 Cal.App. 175, 181) . Waters in navigable and interstate streams (Water ford lrr. Dist. v. Turlock Irr. Dist. (1920) 50 Cal.App. 213, 220) Temporary waters, such as water available only at select times of the year or part-time flows, are also appropriable. Tulare, page 569. Land on which the water can be used. A water user is not required to own land to acquire an appropriative right (Pasadena, pages 925, 927; see Duckworth v. Watsonvllle Water & Light Co. (1907) 150 Cal. 520, 530-531; Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (1929) 207 Cal. 8, 34), but the appropriator must have legal access to the water source. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 23, ~ 775 et seq. In contrast to the riparian doctrine, there is no prohibition against diverting appropriated water outside the watershed. Gallatin, page 413. An appropriator is, however, entitled to protection against the actions of others that would materially impact water quality. Joerger, pages 25-26. Who may appropriate. The ability to appropriate water is very broad. Individuals, firms, associations, organizations, partnerships, and state and federal agencies may all appropriate water. Water Code ~~ 1252, 1252.5. Municipal corporations are also entitled to appropriate water. Water Code ~~ 106.5,1203,1460-1464. However, water may not be appropriated for instream purposes, that is, to require that water be left in a stream as opposed to diversions for consumptive uses. Diversion from the stream and some physical control of the water remains an essential element of an appropria- tive right. Fullerton v. State Water Resources Control Board (1979) 90 Cal.App.3d 590. Priority/Interrelationship with Other Water Rights Rights among appropriators. Appropriative rights can be limited by the rights of other appropriators in the same waters under the flrst-in-time. first-in-right rule. United States v. State Water Resources Control Board (1986) 182 Cal.App.3d 82, 101-102. Traditionally, the prior appropriator takes the full quantity of water that has been appropriated, having a preferred right to the exclusive use of a def- inite amount of flow. Joerger, page 26. This right may also be subject to priorities; for example, some uses, such as domestic ones, are